Make sure you follow all of the action taking place this weekend in Philadelphia at the National Collegiate Women’s Team Championships and the National Collegiate Club Team Championships.
Links to the live draws, live streams, and other information can be found here:
* – New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC) Championships at Williams College
Varsity
No. 21 St. Lawrence men upset No. 16 MIT in a tough 5-4 match. While MIT’s middle of the ladder remained strong, St. Lawrence dominated the top and bottom taking wins at 1,2,3,8, and 9.
No. 19 Amherst men took down No. 18 Bates 8-1 in the quarter final game of the NESCAC Championships. Despite several close matches, Amherst came out on top.
NESCAC Champions
Men
Trinity College – 2023 NESCAC League Champions
Women
Trinity College – 2023 NESCAC League Champions
Club Teams
Fordham University hosted Boston University, Drexel University, Johns Hopkins University, Lehigh University, and New York University for a round of successful matches.
The College Squash Association (CSA) Women’s and Club Team Rankings are now final after all teams in those divisions completed their last regular season matches by this past Sunday. The Men’s Team Rankings are very close to their final form, barring any unexpected results from the final few matches this week.
With the National College Women’s Team Championships and Club Team Championships commencing on Friday this week, the CSA will use these final rankings to populate the tournament draws. The championship draws will be posted on this website and on Club Locker later today.
Trinity College’s Lady Bantams carry an undefeated record into the championships looking for their first Howe Cup title since 2014. That Trinity team was the last team other than Harvard to win the Women’s Team National Championship. Harvard, the 2-seed this season, is on the hunt for their eighth straight Howe Cup championship.
After clinching a Top-8 position on Friday evening against Penn’s women, Virginia caused some reshuffling within the top eight teams with an upset win over Cornell on Sunday.
The final NESCAC Women’s Championship results also led to some reorganization of the standings order around spots 13 through 17, with Williams and Bowdoin each benefitting by one spot.
Brown University’s men’s and women’s club teams are the top seeds heading into the National Collegiate Club Team Championships held at the Arlen Specter US Squash Center starting on Friday. Most of the matches among the 28 men’s and co-ed teams and 11 women’s teams will take place on Saturday and Sunday this weekend.
Chasing Brown on the women’s side will be Boston College and University of Chicago’s inaugural women’s team. George Washington University and Georgetown University are two squads eager to try to unseat Brown in the Men’s Club A Division bracket.
The full set of updated rankings can be viewed here below, while fans can also find the current rankings on the College Squash Team Rankings page all season.
Women’s Varsity Team Rankings as of 2/13/2023
Varsity Rank
Overall Rank
Team Name
Previous
1
1
Trinity College
1
2
2
Harvard University
2
3
3
Princeton University
3
4
4
Drexel University
4
5
5
Virginia, University of
8
6
6
Cornell University
5
7
7
Columbia University
6
8
8
Yale University
7
9
9
Pennsylvania, University of
9
10
10
Dartmouth College
10
11
11
Tufts University
11
12
12
Stanford University
12
13
13
Williams College
14
14
14
William Smith College
13
15
15
Amherst College
15
16
16
Bowdoin College
17
17
17
Middlebury College
16
18
18
Georgetown University
18
19
19
Franklin & Marshall College
19
20
20
Colby College
20
21
21
Wesleyan University
21
22
22
Chatham University
22
23
23
Dickinson College
23
24
24
Denison University
24
25
26
St. Lawrence University
25
26
27
Bates College
27
27
28
Haverford College
26
28
29
Hamilton College
28
29
30
Connecticut College
29
30
34
Mount Holyoke College
31
31
35
Vassar College
30
32
44
Bard College*
32
Women’s Club Team Rankings as of 2/13/2023
Club Rank
Overall Rank
Team Name
Previous
1
25
Brown University
1
2
31
Boston College
2
3
32
Chicago, University of
3
4
33
Northeastern University
4
5
36
Washington Univ. in St. Louis
5
6
37
Boston University
6
7
38
Fordham University
7
8
39
Colgate University
8
9
40
Wellesley College
9
10
41
Bucknell University
11
11
42
North Carolina-Chapel Hill, U. of
12
12
43
Smith College*
10
Men’s Varsity Team Rankings as of 2/13/2023
Varsity Rank
Overall Rank
Team Name
Previous
1
1
Harvard University
1
2
2
Pennsylvania, University of
2
3
3
Princeton University
3
4
4
Yale University
4
5
5
Virginia, University of
6
6
6
Trinity College
5
7
7
Drexel University
7
8
8
Cornell University
8
9
9
Columbia University
9
10
10
Dartmouth College
10
11
11
Chatham University
11
12
12
Western Ontario
12
13
13
Rochester, University of
13
14
14
Williams College
14
15
15
Tufts University
15
16
16
Franklin & Marshall College
17
17
17
MIT
16
18
18
Amherst College
19
19
19
Bates College
18
20
20
St. Lawrence University
21
21
21
Middlebury College
20
22
22
Hobart College
22
23
23
Colby College
23
24
24
Hamilton College
24
25
25
Bowdoin College
25
26
27
Naval Academy
26
27
28
Dickinson College
27
28
29
Wesleyan University
28
29
32
Haverford College
29
30
33
Connecticut College
30
31
34
Denison University
31
32
44
Fordham University
32
33
45
Vassar College
33
34
52
Bard College
34
Men’s/Co-Ed Club Team Rankings as of 2/13/2023
Club Rank
Overall Rank
Team Name
Previous
1
26
Brown University
1
2
30
George Washington Univ.
2
3
31
Georgetown University
3
4
35
Pennsylvania, U. of (CLUB)
4
5
36
Chicago, University of
5
6
37
Cornell University (CLUB)
6
7
38
Northeastern University
9
8
39
Boston University
8
9
40
California-Berkeley, U. of
7
10
41
Richmond, University of
12
11
42
Stanford University
13
12
43
Bucknell University
10
13
46
Michigan, University of
14
14
47
Washington Univ. in St. Louis
15
15
48
Northwestern University
16
16
49
Indiana University
18
17
50
Duke University
17
18
51
UCLA
19
19
53
Lehigh University
21
20
54
Carnegie Mellon University
22
21
55
Boston College
23
22
56
Drexel University (CLUB)
24
23
57
New York University
25
24
58
Johns Hopkins University
29
25
59
Connecticut, University of
26
26
60
Virginia, University of (CLUB)
28
27
61
North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Univ. of
27
28
62
Arizona State
30
29
63
Harvard University (CLUB)*
31
30
64
Dartmouth College (CLUB)*
11
31
65
Notre Dame, University of*
20
32
66
Washington & Lee University*
32
33
67
North Carolina State University*
33
34
68
Davidson College*
34
35
69
Swarthmore College*
35
36
70
Naval Academy (CLUB)*
36
* – Not participating in the National Collegiate Team Championships
Women No. 9 Penn vs. No. 8 Virginia No. 4 Drexel vs. No. 5 Cornell
Men No. 7 Drexel vs. No. 8 Cornell No. 19 Amherst vs. No. 18 Bates
Club Teams
Once again, Fordham University offers a valuable location for competing club teams this weekend, including Boston University, Drexel University, Johns Hopkins University, Lehigh University, and New York University
In an effort to recognize the on-court performance of our players, one women’s player and one men’s player will be highlighted for their accomplishments during each month of the season. CSA congratulates our January Players of the Month: Tate Harms (Harvard) and Hannah Chukwu (Trinity).
CSA Men’s Player of the Month – January Tate Harms, Harvard University
(photo: Dylan Goodman)
Tate Harms, a sophomore from Wollerau, Switzerland, helped secure the Ivy League title for Harvard in January. In a close match up between the top teams in men’s college squash, Harvard and Penn were tied up at 4-4. While Harms, Harvard’s #4 player, dropped the first two games in the deciding match, he fought off multiple match balls to capture a riveting third game. Harms then battled back from 8-5 down in the fifth to win it 11-9 and clinch the 5-4 victory for his team. This match not only determined the CSA Men’s No. 1 ranking but also the Ivy League title. Harms accomplished this massive match, along with an overall 5-1 record in January, while maintaining exemplary sportsmanship and leadership.
CSA Women’s Player of the Month – January Hannah Chukwu, Trinity College
(photo: Stan Godlewski)
Hannah Chukwu, a first-year from Tatabanya, Hungary, had several clutch wins in CSA January matches that secured Trinity’s No. 1 ranking. Most notably, Chukwu’s wins against Harvard, Drexel, and Princeton showed her true strength and determination. She took down top women players in the CSA playing at the #3 and #4 position, moving up in the ladder multiple times in place of injured teammates. Chukwu remained undefeated in all of January play with additional wins against Tufts, Dartmouth, Cornell, Columbia and Penn, leaving her 8-0 for the month.
Following the successful execution of another Mid-Atlantic Squash Conference (MASC) Championship event last weekend, the College Squash Association (CSA) is pleased to announce that MASC is now a fully recognized and sanctioned squash conference within the CSA organization.
Originally formed in 2017 with five institutions signed on, MASC has grown to include six men’s teams and six women’s teams during the 2022-2023 season. Anderson Good, MASC Commissioner and former George Washington University head coach, is credited with the design, formation, and leadership of the conference from its inception to the present.
“I am thrilled that MASC has now gained full conference recognition by the CSA,” said Good. “This further cements our place in the collegiate game and we look forward to continuing to grow and enhancing our student-athlete’s college squash experience.”
MASC has formally crowned men’s and women’s conference champions since 2019. Later that year, CSA granted MASC provisional status as a squash conference in order to support and monitor added structure and growth. Since then, the conference has added named divisions and perpetual trophies at the championships, end-of-season conference awards to recognize the efforts of MASC student-athletes and coaches, and an official website and social media platforms for the conference.
“The CSA is very pleased about the growth and formalization of the Mid-Atlantic Squash Conference,” stated CSA Executive Director & League Commissioner David Poolman. “MASC is truly a flagship organization in a growing geographic region for college squash and a welcome destination for teams that do not have a natural conference affiliation. We are excited to support and celebrate the continued progress of the conference into the future.”
MASC joins the Ivy League, Liberty League, and New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC) as current conferences which sponsor squash competition and championships.
Current MASC member institutions include: Dickinson College, Drexel University, Franklin & Marshall College, Georgetown University (women only), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (men only), U.S. Naval Academy (men only), Stanford University (women only), and University of Virginia.
* – Mid-Atlantic Squash Conference (MASC) Championships ^ – Liberty League Championships
Varsity
Multiple conferences, including MASC and Liberty League, held their championship events this past weekend to wrap up their 2022-2023 season. The Ivy League also named their 2022-2023 conference champions.
Ivy League Champions
Men Harvard University – 2023 Ivy League Champions
Women Harvard University – 2023 Ivy League Champions
Liberty League Champions
Men University of Rochester – 2023 Liberty League Champions
Women William Smith College – 2023 Liberty League Champions
MASC Champions
Men University of Virginia – 2023 MASC Champions
Women Drexel University – 2023 MASC Champions
Club Teams
West Coast Men/Co-Ed Club teams UCLA, Cal and Stanford competed in a small round robin this weekend.
Men/Co-Ed Club teams Georgetown University, Richmond University, George Washington University and Johns Hopkins University had a successful round of matches at Squash on Fire this weekend.
Several midwest club teams gathered at Chicago’s MetroSquash, hosted by University of Chicago, to compete in their final matches before the Club Team Championships.
In their first hosting gig as a formal club program, University of Connecticut welcomed several northeast-based teams to the facility at Avon Old Farms School.
The road to the championships is coming to an exciting end with so much still to play for and only a couple weeks left of the College Squash Association (CSA) regular season. The CSA has posted its penultimate weekly update of the team rankings before the final set of standings come out for the women’s and club teams next week.
The results of the NESCAC Men’s and Women’s Championships, scheduled for this coming weekend, will have a major impact on the final seedings going into the National Championships because of the teams bunched together in places 14-20 in both polls. Only teams ranked nine through 16 earn a berth into B Division at nationals, so multiple teams will be looking for that final victory to either secure their place or put them over the top into the next tier.
Remaining non-conference match-ups like Virginia vs. Penn and Cornell vs. both Virginia and Drexel are the last puzzle pieces to figure out the top divisions in both varsity championships. Friday’s Virginia-Penn women’s match and the full match-up between Cornell and Drexel are not to be missed. The women’s positions five through nine are still totally unsettled after CSA overturned Yale’s result against Columbia due to a disciplinary issue.
The club team rankings are also coming into clearer view with the National Collegiate Club Team Championships scheduled for Feb. 17-19 at the Arlen Specter US Squash Center in Philadelphia. The new club rankings reflect a mix of regular season results and an assessment of likely starting lineups for the championship event.
The full set of rankings can be viewed here below, while fans should look for regular updates on the College Squash Team Rankings page all season.
Women’s Varsity Team Rankings as of 2/6/2023
Varsity Rank
Overall Rank
Team Name
Previous
1
1
Trinity College
1
2
2
Harvard University
2
3
3
Princeton University
3
4
4
Drexel University
4
5
5
Cornell University
5
6
6
Columbia University
8
7
7
Yale University
6
8
8
Virginia, University of
7
9
9
Pennsylvania, University of
9
10
10
Dartmouth College
10
11
11
Tufts University
11
12
12
Stanford University
12
13
13
William Smith College
13
14
14
Williams College
14
15
15
Amherst College
15
16
16
Middlebury College
16
17
17
Bowdoin College
17
18
18
Georgetown University
18
19
19
Franklin & Marshall College
19
20
20
Colby College
20
21
21
Wesleyan University
21
22
22
Chatham University
22
23
23
Dickinson College
24
24
24
Denison University
23
25
26
St. Lawrence University
26
26
27
Haverford College
25
27
28
Bates College
27
28
29
Hamilton College
28
29
30
Connecticut College
29
30
31
Vassar College
30
31
35
Mount Holyoke College
31
32
44
Bard College
32
Women’s Club Team Rankings as of 2/6/2023
Club Rank
Overall Rank
Team Name
Previous
1
25
Brown University
1
2
32
Boston College
2
3
33
Chicago, University of
3
4
34
Northeastern University
4
5
36
Washington Univ. in St. Louis
5
6
37
Boston University
6
7
38
Fordham University
7
8
39
Colgate University
8
9
40
Wellesley College
9
10
41
North Carolina-Chapel Hill, U. of
12
11
42
Bucknell University
11
12
43
Smith College*
10
Men’s Varsity Team Rankings as of 2/6/2023
Varsity Rank
Overall Rank
Team Name
Previous
1
1
Harvard University
1
2
2
Pennsylvania, University of
2
3
3
Princeton University
3
4
4
Yale University
4
5
5
Trinity College
5
6
6
Virginia, University of
6
7
7
Drexel University
7
8
8
Cornell University
8
9
9
Columbia University
9
10
10
Dartmouth College
10
11
11
Chatham University
11
12
12
Western Ontario
12
13
13
Rochester, University of
13
14
14
Williams College
14
15
15
Tufts University
15
16
16
MIT
17
17
17
Franklin & Marshall College
16
18
18
Bates College
18
19
19
Amherst College
19
20
20
Middlebury College
20
21
21
St. Lawrence University
22
22
22
Hobart College
21
23
23
Colby College
23
24
24
Hamilton College
24
25
25
Bowdoin College
25
26
27
Naval Academy
26
27
28
Dickinson College
28
28
29
Wesleyan University
27
29
32
Haverford College
29
30
33
Connecticut College
30
31
34
Denison University
31
32
41
Fordham University
32
33
42
Vassar College
33
34
53
Bard College
34
Men’s/Co-Ed Club Team Rankings as of 2/6/2023
Club Rank
Overall Rank
Team Name
Previous
1
26
Brown University
1
2
30
George Washington Univ.
8
3
31
Georgetown University
2
4
35
Pennsylvania, Univ. of (CLUB)
3
5
36
Chicago, University of
4
6
37
Cornell University (CLUB)
19
7
38
California-Berkeley, U. of
10
8
39
Boston University
5
9
40
Northeastern University
6
10
41
Bucknell University
7
11
44
Dartmouth College (CLUB)
13
12
45
Richmond, University of
14
13
46
Stanford University
15
14
47
Michigan, University of
17
15
48
Washington Univ. in St. Louis
16
16
49
Northwestern University
NR
17
50
Duke University
21
18
51
Indiana University
25
19
52
UCLA
22
20
54
Notre Dame, University of
NR
21
55
Lehigh University
29
22
56
Carnegie Mellon University
27
23
57
Boston College
28
24
58
Drexel University (CLUB)
18
25
59
New York University
12
26
60
Connecticut, University of
11
27
61
North Carolina-Chapel Hill, U. of
24
28
62
Virginia, University of (CLUB)
26
29
63
Johns Hopkins University
23
30
64
Arizona State
32
31
65
Harvard University (CLUB)*
9
32
66
Washington & Lee University*
20
33
67
North Carolina State University*
30
34
68
Davidson College*
31
35
69
Swarthmore College*
33
36
70
Naval Academy (CLUB)*
34
* – Not participating in National Collegiate Club Team Championships.
Welcome to Coaches Corner – a column for CSA coaches to provide insight, advice, and anecdotes. This week we welcome Wesleyan’s Head Men’s and Women’s Coach, Shona Kerr. Below, Shona discusses the different phases of growth players face when joining a college squash team.
As a coach and educator, I am constantly evaluating what I teach my students and its place within the American student-athlete concept. At Universities we are in the human development business. This can get obscured in the heat of competition, in the pursuit of a better ranking and the prowess of winning. I will discuss the optimal group dynamics of teams and the evolution of varsity squash players through their four years in college. The goal is for players to develop into dynamic individuals ready to take on the greater world around them and fulfill their best potential.
I have a student athlete who went 88-1 in her college career and won the Betty Richey award (the highest award that is bestowed to a senior in college squash). Through others noticing her hard work and abilities, she was offered a job with a prestigious bank and is still there today. This is a successful student-athlete. On a different note, I received a text from a recent graduate to thank me for where she had found herself. Her experience on the squash team gave her the life tools and connections needed to land her dream job, and I quote, was “all because of squash”. While at the bottom of the roster for four years, she never stopped working hard, always showed up on time and offered to help the team in any way she could. Having learned our squash strategies, and having watched so many matches from the bench, she became a great contributor as a coach. This is also a successful student-athlete.
What does it look like when college squash is done right? What did the student’s experience give to them and did they graduate as a more evolved individual? I take the term student-athlete literally in that academia, coupled with what is learned as an athlete on a team, can offer a significantly enhanced education.
Lately, I have been delving into Stephen Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly Effective People and feel one could do a lot worse than to use this model for the holistic development of our students. There are so many life lessons to glean from this book – it has stood the test of time for good reason. The one I will extract here is his Maturity Continuum paradigm and look at how it relates to the development of our four-year student-athletes.
The Maturity Continuum presents the evolution of human growth from Dependent to Independent to Interdependent. To quote Covey:
“Dependenceis the paradigm of you – you take care of me: you come through for me; you didn’t come through: I blame you for the results.
Independenceis the paradigm of I – I can do it: I am responsible; I am self-reliant: I can choose.
Interdependenceis the paradigm of we; we can do it; we can cooperate; we can combine our talents and abilities to create something greater together”.
If my players leave as interdependent individuals (or at least on their way), I have given them one of the ultimate tools they can have in entering the workforce, managing a family, starting their own company – whatever sphere they choose to commit to.
When players start as first-years they are dependent. They need to be told how to be an effective teammate and student-athlete. As much as I work to prepare students, there really is no substitute to the experiential aspect of joining a new team. Athletes start with varying backgrounds. Some solely worked with a private coach, played when they chose to and individually competed in tournaments. Others played on a high school team, of which the programs can have varying degrees of rigor. Some come in with both. Others come from a SEA (Squash and Education Alliance) program. Some come from more, or less, rigorous schools academically, schools that don’t give grades, or from abroad – it’s an adjustment.
First years are eager to fit in, find their place on the team and bond with their new teammates. It is my job to educate the students to be proactive in seeking what they need. Whether that is extra hitting time, one-on-one sessions, how to use the training/physiotherapy resources when needed for injury, rehab/prehab, syncing the team google calendar of events to their devices, finding peer tutors for their classes, helping them learn how to schedule their time, etc. Not to mention the social side of the team. Some players need a little help knowing when they really should join the team for an apple picking excursion or when it is a more casual trip with a few others to a movie. It is also a time to look ahead to set goals for their four-year membership – what do they want to achieve? This way we can start the process of reverse engineering and mapping out what’s required to attain these goals.
I had a student graduate about five years ago and had asked what his goals were. He was very clear that he wanted to ultimately play top three on the team. In his first year, he barely made the starting nine and wasn’t too sure about me as his new coach (he really missed his previous coach). We very much clicked when he decided to give me a chance. He went through all of the maturity continuum stages and finished his career playing number two – with a winning record. This is what is possible. Through his good habits he left operating very much as an interdependent person that had used all the people and resources around him to excel.
A current first-year student recently played a thrilling five game match in front of a packed house, which he won 13-11 in the fifth. Afterwards he put his head through my office door and said “that was thrilling, now I get it”. He felt like he belonged and found his home, another step along the path that the first-years have to make.
My point being is that it can be bumpy at the start before students find their flow.
As sophomores and juniors, they are working towards independence. Having gone through one complete cycle of a college team year, independence begins to happen while hopefully forming good study and training habits. They have a more complete idea of how the team works socially and emotionally, as well as a clearer picture of how to improve their game. With this they can more easily self-direct. They know how to complete the weight lifting program ascribed and don’t need to be shown. They know how a college match runs, they know they are expected to be at practice on time, they are more comfortable with the coaches and in seeking out what they need. They are able to begin prioritizing changes they are making to their game, and in what order to progress. They show up to the team events that they should and are helpful to others when asked. The collective sum of good habits are the tenets of creating leadership, and as Covey states, leadership is not possible without first achieving independence.
There are two players that pop into my mind when I think of this stage. They were equally driven to improve with totally opposite styles of play. I witnessed the shift to independence after their first season finished and would find them independently training together and working on the areas that each needed to improve.
As juniors and seniors, they begin the path to interdependence – a higher level of operating that allows the team to collectively achieve more together than as individuals. I always remind people that although squash is an individual sport college squash is played as a team – no one can do it alone. They start to appreciate match play with teammates as an opportunity to test their game versus a chance to prove themselves individually. They are comfortable initiating feedback to teammates and proactively ask for coaching from their peers and coaches. They recognize the collective team goals and are constantly thinking of ways to help others get there. They start to become comfortable bringing team concerns to the coaching staff and are learning to trust that others can help. They actively check in with players to make sure they are doing well, both on and off the court. If something needs doing, they just do it, or have learned to delegate to the best person for a particular task. They begin to solicit help from graduates that have gone before them as they navigate the job and internship market, and life after university.
As an example, there was a first-year athlete that was struggling with adjustment to college. The senior captains were acutely aware of this and brought it to my attention. The solution was as simple as taking this player to breakfast to talk about how school was going and what their expectations were. It transpired that this student cared so deeply that they were almost getting in the way of themselves. Having worked through this issue, I attempted to help them adjust their approach to a more positive approach and they are now a thriving member of the team.
When done right the synergy of an interdependent team is exhilarating. The hard work is done at practice, in the gym and in the classroom. On match day, a functioning team should just flow with their actions, and can be a marvel to watch.
Covey’s seventh habit is called Sharpening the Saw and pertains to the constant renewal of oneself. This habit is essential to progress from dependence to interdependence. It has four elements shown below. Again, good character is the collective of good habits which in turn creates leaders of good character (and ultimately winning). Without this habit it is extremely hard for an athlete to fulfill their potential.
Here is Covey’s diagram for his seventh habit – Sharpening the Saw:
From the 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, Stephen R. Covey
The classroom offers mental sharpening. Good athletic habits (i.e., sleep, nutrition, stretching) and training address the physical aspect. The player-to-player interaction provides the social and emotional portion. Last is a spiritual piece, which could be religious, but can also be a personal worldview. It is better put as your value system. Learning how to take care of one’s own renewal allows for optimal performance on court and in all areas of life.
We talk about this on the team in terms of working towards your ideal performance state. In a recent match, one of my more competitively reliable players lost an eminently winnable match in five games. He looked flat on his feet and missed shots that he would normally make. Something was off. We talked afterwards and it transpired that he’d had little sleep in the last two days due to academic work and thought he could overcome this with caffeine. The lesson was learned, you have to work on daily renewal to be at your best for everything you do. It is why I ask the team to complete match evaluation forms post play. The first question is “describe your preparation for this match, sleep, nutrition, warm up, etc”. Through self-reflection the student-athletes begin to see the positive patterns that lead to success.
The secret here is that squash is the educational vehicle and human development is the product. A complete student-athlete experience can teach all the elements of Covey’s seven habits and guide a person from dependence through to interdependence – a higher level of operating. A job well done is a student who graduates having learned and lived these applications, elevating them for their next life chapter and beyond.