Home Blog Page 89

Around the Courts: College Squash Highlights (2/5/2017)

0

College Squash AssociationHatfield, MA — This week’s collegiate squash was dominated by the NESCAC and Liberty League Championships.

On Tuesday, George Washington hosted Virginia. The pair of teams were competing for the Washington/Jefferson Squash Cup, which goes to the school with the most cumulative victories in the men’s and women’s matches. The GW women avenged a 5-4 December loss with a 7-2 victory over the Cavaliers. The GW men won 8-1.

Penn visited Princeton on Wednesday. The 6th-ranked Quaker men defeated 10th-ranked Princeton, 6-3. This marked the Penn men’s first victory at Princeton since 1973. The Penn women defeated the Tigers, 8-1. In Massachusetts, the 28th-ranked Conn College women visited 26th-ranked Wellesley. The Camels emerged with a 5-4 victory.

On Friday, Navy travelled to Hobart and shutout the Statesmen.

Saturday began a weekend of Ivy League play. Brown hosted Penn. The Quakers defeated both Brown squads. At Yale, Princeton faced the Bulldogs. In the men’s match, Yale defeated the Tigers, 6-3. The 5th-ranked Yale women almost surprised 4th-ranked Princeton. Thanks to winning the bottom five ladder positions, the Tigers emerged with a 5-4 victory. In New Hampshire, Dartmouth and Cornell traded matches. The Big Green won the men’s match, 8-1, while Cornell won the women’s match, 7-2. In Boston, Harvard defeated both Columbia squads.

In Pennsylvania, Haverford hosted Navy and Georgetown. In the women’s match, Haverford earned a 5-4 victory over Georgetown. For the men, Haverford lost 0-9 to Navy, but shutout Georgetown. In the nation’s capital, George Washington defeated both Franklin and Marshall squads.

On Sunday, Ivy League play continued. Brown hosted and lost to both Princeton squads. The Harvard men and women defeated Cornell. Columbia visited Dartmouth. The Columbia men defeated Dartmouth, 8-1, while the Columbia women beat the Big Green, 7-2. Penn visited Yale. The Penn women defeated the Bulldogs, 9-0, while in the men’s match, 9th-ranked Yale defeated 6th-ranked Penn, 7-2.

The Liberty League tournament was held this weekend at the University of Rochester and the Genesee Valley Club. Traditionally, this event is held at the beginning of the season, but starting this season, the event was moved to February. The five Liberty League men’s schools (Bard, Hobart, Rochester, St. Lawrence, and Vassar) compete in the event. Please note there is not a Liberty League women’s championship.

On Saturday, Rochester defeated Vassar, 9-0, and Hobart defeated Bard, 9-0. In addition, Bard defeated Vassar, 6-3, and St. Lawrence was victorious over Hobart, 8-1. The evening match between 4th-ranked Rochester and 7th-ranked St. Lawrence was the featured match of the tournament. Down 2-4, St. Lawrence came back to tie the match at 4-4 with only the #1 match to play. Trailing 1-2 in games, St. Lawrence’s top player won the final two games to win the team match for the Saints.

The round robin tournament concluded on Sunday with a series of 9-0 matches. Rochester defeated Bard and Hobart, St. Lawrence defeated Vassar and Bard, and Hobart defeated Vassar. St. Lawrence captured their fourth consecutive Liberty League title. With this title, St. Lawrence and Rochester are tied with six overall Liberty League crowns.

This weekend, Amherst College hosted the 11th New England Small College Athletic Conference Championships. Eleven schools participated in the men’s and women’s event (Amherst, Bates, Bowdoin, Colby, Conn College, Hamilton, Middlebury, Trinity, Tufts, Wesleyan, and Williams).

The women’s championship began on Friday with Colby defeating Wesleyan, 7-2, Bowdoin defeating Hamilton, 8-1, and Tufts defeating Conn College, 8-1. The quarterfinals began bright and early at 8 AM on Saturday morning. Bates defeated Amherst, 7-2, and Trinity shutout Colby. In the second round of quarterfinal matches, Middlebury blanked Colby and Williams shutout Bowdoin. In the afternoon semifinals, Trinity defeated Bates, 9-0, and Williams defeated Middlebury, 8-1.

At Smith College for consolation play, Wesleyan edged Hamilton, 5-4, and shutout Conn College. Hamilton defeated Conn College, 7-2. Back at Amherst, Bowdoin defeated Tufts, 5-4, and Amherst defeated Colby, 6-3.

The championship concluded on Sunday with Trinity defeating Williams for their 11th-consecutive conference title. In the match for 3rd place, Bates defeated Middlebury, 5-4. Colby defeated Tufts, 7-2, and Amherst defeated Bowdoin, 5-4.

The men’s championship opened on Friday with Wesleyan defeating Tufts, 7-2, Amherst shutting out Conn College, and Bowdoin defeating Hamilton, 7-2. On Saturday, the quarterfinals featured Middlebury’s 9-0 victory over Colby, Trinity shutting out Wesleyan, Williams defeating Amherst, 7-2, and Bates defeating Bowdoin, 9-0. The seedings continued to hold during the semifinals. Trinity defeated Middlebury, 9-0, and Bates defeated Williams, 7-2.

In consolation play hosted by Smith College on Saturday, Tufts defeated Hamilton, 6-3, and Conn College, 7-2. Hamilton was a 6-3 victor over Conn College. In the consolation rounds at Amherst, Colby defeated Wesleyan, 6-3, and Amherst defeated Bowdoin, 6-3.

On Sunday, Wesleyan earned the first seeding upset of the tournament with a 9-0 victory over Bowdoin. Colby defeated Amherst, 6-3. Middlebury defeated Williams, 5-4, to capture 3rd place in the event. Trinity remains undefeated all-time in NESCAC Tournament play with a victory over Bates. This marked the 11th NESCAC title for the Bantams.

In club-vs.-club women’s matches Virginia defeated Cal (twice), Johns Hopkins, Fordham, and Washington St. Louis (twice).

In club-vs.-club men’s matches Boston College defeated Duke. Boston University defeated Bryant, Colgate, Swarthmore, and Ithaca. Brandeis defeated Babson. Colgate defeated Swarthmore and Bryant. Duke defeated Vanderbilt and Sewanee. NYU defeated Bucknell. Notre Dame defeated UNC. Virginia defeated UNC, Notre Dame, Duke, BC, and Sewanee. Vanderbilt  defeated Sewanee.

Schools are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, a minimum number of matches must be played at specific periods of the season:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.

For complete results from all of this weekend’s action, see Women’s Results and Men’s Results.

2016-2017 Dunlop Men’s College Squash Team Rankings (1/29/2017)

0
[rankingimage]Hatfield, MA — Today, the eighth [mtr] of the season were released.

This is the first week of computerized ranking. Earlier this week, an article explaining the computerized ranking methodology was published.

As part of the computerized rankings, the College Squash Association will rank varsity and club teams that have played at least five matches utilizing the Elo ranking methodology. If needed, the Ranking Chair may adjust a non-varsity team’s ranking position.

Harvard’s victory over Rochester propelled the undefeated Crimson into the top ranking position.

Teams throughout the rankings are extremely close in the computerized ranking. With teams trading matches throughout the season, there are many key contests in the coming weeks that appear to be crucial for the final rankings before Team Championships.

Teams are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, they must meet minimum match requirements:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

Below are the [mtr] as of 1/29/2017. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking and their Elo point total.

  1. Harvard University (4; 1252.845)
  2. Trinity College (2; 1224.486)
  3. Columbia University (3; 1224.476)
  4. Rochester, University of (1; 1224.366)
  5. Drexel University (5; 1197.186)
  6. Pennsylvania, University of (6; 1178.779)
  7. St. Lawrence University (7; 1159.052)
  8. Dartmouth College (9; 1153.522)
  9. Yale University (8; 1138.343)
  10. Princeton University (10; 1130.432)
  11. Cornell University (13; 1111.465)
  12. Western Ontario, University of (12; 1111.391)
  13. Naval Academy (11; 1111.087)
  14. George Washington University (14; 1110.625)
  15. Franklin & Marshall College (15; 1089.994)
  16. Bates College (16; 1089.515)
  17. Williams College (17; 1083.381)
  18. Middlebury College (18; 1079.666)
  19. Virginia, University of (NR; 1076.060)
  20. Brown University (19; 1074.894)
  21. MIT (20; 1054.720)
  22. Dickinson College (21; 1053.664)
  23. Colby College (22; 1050.374)
  24. Amherst College (25; 1043.056)
  25. Hobart College (23; 1042.799)
  26. Bowdoin College (24; 1037.842)
  27. Wesleyan University (26; 1033.915)
  28. Tufts University (28; 1028.727)
  29. Hamilton College (27; 1025.055)
  30. Connecticut College (29; 1006.924)
  31. Stanford University (NR; 1006.592)
  32. Boston College (NR; 994.806)
  33. New York University (NR; 992.192)
  34. Bucknell University (NR; 990.388)
  35. Haverford College (30; 989.947)
  36. Denison University (NR; 972.992)
  37. Georgetown University (NR; 961.149)
  38. Lehigh University (NR; 951.329)
  39. Washington, University of (NR; 945.638)
  40. Chicago, University of (NR; 944.33)
  41. Duke University (NR; 1029.392)*
  42. Richmond, University of (NR; 927.494)
  43. Northwestern University (NR; 926.551)
  44. Bard College (31; 912.834)
  45. Fordham University (32; 910.266)
  46. Johns Hopkins University (NR; 909.510)
  47. Northeastern University (NR; 907.567)
  48. Boston University (NR; 899.634)
  49. Vassar College (33; 894.695)
  50. Southern California, University of (NR; 891.77)
  51. Colgate University (NR; 890.181)
  52. Lafayette College (NR; 888.225)
  53. Swarthmore College (NR; 883.225)
  54. Brandeis University (NR; 861.299)
  55. Minnesota, University of (NR; 856.491)
  56. Notre Dame, University of (NR; 856.458)
  57. Siena College (NR; 833.951)

*Non-varsity adjustment

2016-2017 Dunlop Women’s College Squash Team Rankings (1/29/2017)

0
[rankingimage]Hatfield, MA — Today, the eighth [wtr] of the season were released.

This is the first week of computerized ranking. Earlier this week, an article explaining the computerized ranking methodology was published.

As part of the computerized rankings, the College Squash Association will rank varsity and club teams that have played at least five matches utilizing the Elo ranking methodology. If needed, the Ranking Chair may adjust a non-varsity team’s ranking position.

Cornell’s 6-3 victory over Columbia helped move the Big Red into the 7th ranking position.

After having their first losses of the season over the weekend, Tufts fell one position to 19th.

William Smith moved ahead of St. Lawrence after the Herons’ 5-4 victory on Saturday.

Teams are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, they must meet minimum match requirements:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

Below are the [wtr] as of 1/29/2017. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking and their Elo point total.

  1. Harvard University (1; 1248.986)
  2. Pennsylvania, University of (2; 1220.274)
  3. Trinity College (3; 1195.961)
  4. Princeton University (4; 1183.566)
  5. Yale University (6; 1173.784)
  6. Stanford University (5; 1152.866)
  7. Cornell University (8; 1134.240)
  8. Columbia University (7; 1116.208)
  9. Brown University (10; 1098.729)
  10. Williams College (11; 1081.659)
  11. Dartmouth College (9; 1076.933)
  12. Virginia, University of (NR; 1064.820)
  13. George Washington University (12; 1047.927)
  14. Middlebury College (14; 1031.822)
  15. Bates College (16; 1029.179)
  16. Drexel University (15; 1028.743)
  17. Franklin and Marshall College (13; 1025.648)
  18. Amherst College (17; 1004.536)
  19. Tufts University (18; 990.733)
  20. Dickinson College (21; 986.944)
  21. Bowdoin College (22; 984.735)
  22. William Smith College (24; 982.157)
  23. St. Lawrence University (19; 980.027)
  24. Wesleyan University (23; 979.918)
  25. Colby College (25; 977.811)
  26. Wellesley College (20; 975.785)
  27. Hamilton College (26; 969.436)
  28. Vassar College (27; 962.118)
  29. Connecticut College (28; 942.687)
  30. Northeastern University (NR; 925.105)
  31. Mount Holyoke College (29; 905.710)
  32. Haverford College (30; 884.318)
  33. Smith College (NR; 871.633)
  34. Denison University (NR; 862.122)
  35. Rochester, University of (NR; 835.720)
  36. Johns Hopkins University (NR; 830.315)

College Squash Rewind (January 2017)

0

Hatfield, MA — The first month of 2017 was very busy for college squash. Let’s look back at the articles from January.

Don’t forget to follow the College Squash Association on FacebookTwitter, or YouTube for more great coverage of college squash.

The editorial staff is always looking for story ideas, articles, photos, or videos, and we encourage coaches and players to submit content. Our goal is to provide coverage of all levels of college squash throughout the United States. Please feel free to contact the editorial staff.

Many thanks go to the College Squash Association’s sponsors and partners:

  • Harrow Sports (Official Equipment Supplier) – Harrow provides custom school equipment;
  • Dunlop Sports (Official Ball Supplier) – Dunlop balls are used in all team and individual matches;
  • US Squash (Partner)  – US Squash provides dual match tracking software and organizes the CSA’s three national championships; and
  • mtbello.com (Partner) – mtbello.com provides squash photography to the CSA.

If companies are interested in sponsoring or advertising on the College Squash Association website, please visit the Advertise/Sponsor page.

Here are the articles from January 2017:

Harrow Sports College Squash Player of the Week (1/29/2017)

[powimage]

Hatfield, MA — For the week ending 1/29/2017, Cornell’s Rachel Scherman and MIT’s Neel Das have been named the women’s and men’s [hpow].

A [hpow] should have a significant impact on his or her team’s performance during the prior week and demonstrate sportsmanship. Coaches and Sports Information Directors may nominate players.

Rachel Scherman (Cornell University): On Sunday, 8th-ranked Cornell visited 7th-ranked Columbia. Five of the nine individual matches went to five games. At the match at the #2 position, Cornell’s senior co-captain Rachel Scherman faced Madlen O’Connor. With the match tied at two games a piece, Scherman captured the final game (7-11, 11-7, 11-8, 7-11, and 11-9) to help Cornell to a 6-3 team victory.

Neel Das (Massachusetts Institute of Technology): The 20th-ranked MIT Engineers travelled to Maine on Friday to face Bowdoin. MIT had not beaten Bowdoin since the 1993 – 1994 season. MIT freshman Neel Das faced Bowdoin’s George Cooley at the match at the #6 position. With the match tied at 2-2, Das captured the fifth game (7-11, 11-6, 11-4, 7-11, and 11-7) to help the Engineers to a 5-4 team victory.

College Squash Association’s Computerized Ranking Methodology

0

College Squash AssociationHatfield, MA — Beginning this week, the College Squash Association shifts from manual rankings to computerized rankings.

Prior to the 2015 – 2016 season, the CSA utilized a manual ranking process that included a number of tie-breaking scenarios. This method worked fine for years; however, over the last few seasons, the parity between teams has increased. This parity led to challenging ranking situations, which in turn led to the computerized ranking process.

Each season, team rankings are divided into three phases:

  1. The preseason team rankings are determined by a poll of varsity coaches;
  2. After the preseason rankings are published, the men’s and women’s ranking chairs and the Executive Administrator manually rank the teams;
  3. Beginning with the ranking cycle that includes January 25th, a computerized ranking system will be enabled.

The third phase of the season’s ranking cycle is now upon us. The computerized ranking system the CSA will utilize is self-consistent Elo ranking, a modification of standard Elo to remove any dependence on match order. All matches are taken into account up to the ranking date, treating a match played on November 1st as having the same importance as a match played on the final day of the regular season.

Elo methodology is used by numerous organizations to calculate the relative skill levels of teams in competitor-versus-competitor situations. The method determines ranking points for each team based on match outcome. The distribution of ranking points among teams is such that the difference in points between any two teams at a given time is a predictor for the outcome of a future match between those two teams. The larger the difference in ranking points between the two teams, the larger is the expectation that the team with the greater number of points would beat the team with the smaller number of points.

Every team starts the season with the same number of points. In the CSA’s case, this number is 1,000.

When two teams with equal points play each other, the system assumes that each team has a 50% probability of winning. The winning team has exceeded expectations, and the losing team has failed to meet expectations. Elo exchanges points between the two teams, the winning team increasing its points and the losing team decreasing its points by the same amount. The adjusted points reflect an expectation of the result of a potential rematch between the teams.

When a higher-ranked team defeats a lower-ranked team, and the ranking points differential between the two teams is large, the ranking points do not change greatly for either team since the outcome was expected. However, if the lower-ranked team defeats the higher-ranked team there is a substantial exchange of ranking points between the two teams, the lower ranked team gaining points roughly in proportion to the point differential between the two teams prior to the match.

In the weekly rankings, the point totals for each team will be listed. Since the Elo ranking methodology is based on points, it is possible to have ties. The CSA implemented tie-breaking rules if this scenario occurs:

  • If the tied teams faced each other during the current season, the winner of the last meeting is placed ahead of the losing team;
  • If the head-to-head tiebreaker does not determine a winner, the team with the victory over the highest ranked opponent not involved in the tie is deemed the winner of the tie.

Included in the computerized rankings are all varsity schools and club teams that have played at least five matches. Teams that have “Not on Roster” players listed in their match results will not be ranked until those reported matches are corrected.

Per the CSA’s rules, if needed, the Ranking Chair may adjust a non-varsity team’s Elo ranking position. This may be warranted if a club team did not play varsity squads and is undefeated. In this example, the Elo ranking system may inadvertently boost the club team’s ranking based on points. In running past seasons through the Elo ranking system, there were a few non-varsity teams that required adjustment due to their limited schedules.

All varsity teams will be included in the Elo rankings. Club teams that have played five or more matches will also be included.

The individual rankings are generally based on an Elo ranking model as well. These rankings will seed the individual tournament. The CSA will utilize the final top-9 ladder positions played by each team at Team Championships to assist in the ranking process. For example, the #1 player on each team is assumed to be stronger at that moment in time than the #2 player, while the #2 player is assumed to be stronger at the moment in time than the #3 player. Using intra-team positioning and play against opposing schools will create a much more accurate individual ranking system.

2017 Mens Pioneer Valley Squash Invitational: Wesleyan and Hamilton (Video)

Northampton, MA — On the weekend of January 20th – 22nd, the 2017 Pioneer Valley Invitational was hosted by Amherst College, Mount Holyoke College, and Smith College.

On the third day of the three-day event, Wesleyan and Hamilton played at Smith College.

In the match at the #4 position, Hamilton freshman Tristan Chaix faced Wesleyan senior Alex Kamisher. The pair played a five-game match, which Chaix won (8-11, 12-10, 12-10, 5-11, and 11-9).

Wesleyan captured the team match, 6-3.

At the Pioneer Valley Invitational, Hamilton went 1-2 with a victory over Stanford. Wesleyan went 2-1 at the PVI with victories over Hamilton and Stanford. Both teams are headed to the 2017 NESCAC Championships this coming weekend (February 3rd – 5th).

Below is video from the match.

College Squash Reminder (1/29/2017)

0

Hatfield, MA — On Sunday, the e-mail below was sent to coaches and team contacts.

Coaches, Team Contacts, and SIDs,

A few reminders

Varsity Coaches Meetings at Team Championships: On Friday at 8:30 PM at both the Men’s and Women’s Team Championships there will be a varsity coaches meeting. At these meetings, there will be important organizational structure votes that require all varsity coaches to be in attendance. If you are a dual gender coach, you need to attend both meetings. More information about these meetings will be distributed soon.

Preliminary Schedules for Team Championships: Preliminary draws for Team Championships will be released this week.

Scholar Athlete/Academic Recognition Nominations: Nominations and forms for Scholar Athlete/Academic Recognition must be submitted to Dent Wilkens (dent.wilkens@ussquash.com) by February 10th. Late submissions will not be accepted. If a school has a January term, do not wait for January grades prior to submitting the forms. Here is a link to the article with this year’s forms.

Awards: Varsity coaches have received four e-mail reminders about nominating players and teams for post season awards. Please remember to nominate players by February 1st (Wednesday) for the women’s Richey and Wetzel awards and the men’s Skillman award.
 
Team Rankings: The next rankings will be reviewed on Monday at 6 PM ET. Please log the results into the US Squash Scoring System; otherwise these matches will not be considered for ranking purposes. Without results in the US Squash Scoring System, your team will not be credited appropriately. This week, the computerized rankings begin.An article will be posted mid-week with details about the computerized rankings.

Harrow Sports Player of the Week: Please nominate deserving players for Player of the Week honors by 6 PM ET on Monday.

  • Criteria: A Player of the Week should have a significant impact on his or her team’s performance during the prior week and demonstrate sportsmanship.
  • Nominations: Coaches, Sports Information Directors, and Team Contacts.

SquashCares: The CSA will be supporting SquashCares, an initiative that recycles used squash balls to make therapeutic ball blankets for people with disabilities. For details, please visit the website.

Match Results with “Not on Roster” players: The following teams need to fix their results with “Not on Roster” players. These club teams will not be eligible for rankings or Team Championships if these match results are not fixed. Club teams that have played at least five (5) matches become eligible for rankings this week. The teams listed in bold below will not be ranked unless their “Not on Roster” results are fixed by 6 PM ET on Monday.

Men’s Teams (as of 1/29, 6th warning to teams in bold):

  • Babson – Brandeis University vs. Babson College – Missing #s 1-9
  • Babson – Northeastern University vs. Babson College – Missing #s 2-8
  • Bryant – Bard College vs. Bryant – Missing #6,8,9
  • Bryant – MIT vs. Bryant University – Missing #8
  • Bryant – Lehigh University vs. Bryant University – Missing #8
  • Cal – University of California, Berkeley vs. Naval Academy – Missing #8
  • Johns Hopkins – Fordham University vs. Johns Hopkins University – Missing #9
  • Ohio State – Ohio St University vs. University of Notre Dame – Missing #s 1,3,7,8

Women’s Teams (as of 1/29, 6th warning to all teams in bold):

  • Bucknell – Bucknell University vs. Denison University – Missing #s 7

Please contact Dent Wilkens (dent.wilkens@ussquash.com) if you need assistance fixing match results with “Not on Roster” players. Remember, as a coach or team contact, you may create a US Squash account for a player who does not have one (see the Managing Your Roster link). You do not have to wait for the individual player to create an account.
 
SQUASHTV Discounts: SQUASHTV is offering college squash teams discounts on subscription packages. For details, please refer to the website.

Qualifications for Team Nationals:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

Rule Updates: During the offseason, the Executive Committees reviewed the College Squash Association’s rules. In preparation for the 2016 – 2017 season, the College Squash Association has updated six of its rules. An article summarizing the changes was published on the website in October. Coaches and Team Contacts need to be familiar with these rule updates. To see exact changes, please refer to the “Update on″ link at the bottom of the page for each modified rule.

Minimum # of Players: For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Matches with fewer than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.

Hotels for Team and Individual Championships: In addition to information on Team Championship hotels, hotel information for the individual championships is now on the Championship Info page.

Squash Ball Orders: With the season starting, the CSA encourages you to take advantage of the organization’s relationship with Dunlop to order the balls you need for the year. Revenue from the sales goes to the CSA and helps us meet our mission of supporting continued success of college squash. Balls are sold for $30/dozen. Please contact Dent Wilkens with any questions related to squash ball orders. To place your order, please visit the following link: http://collegesquashassociation.com/coaches/dunlop-squash-ball-orders/

Contact Information: If you are receiving this reminder and are no longer your team’s contact, please let Dent Wilkens and Michael T. Bello ASAP.

Around the Courts: College Squash Highlights (1/29/2017)

0

College Squash AssociationHatfield, MA — There was collegiate squash play throughout New England and the Mid Atlantic states this week.

On Tuesday, Brown visited Williams. The schools traded matches with the 10th-ranked Brown women escaping with a 5-4 victory over the 11th-ranked Ephs, while the Williams men won, 6-3.

Bates visited NESCAC and Maine rival Colby on Wednesday. The Bobcats won the men’s match, 8-1, and the women’s match, 7-2. The Penn men hosted the Naval Academy. The Quakers earned a 7-2 victory over the Midshipmen.

Friday began a busy squash weekend. MIT travelled north to Bowdoin. The 24th-ranked Bowdoin men fell just short of upsetting 20th-ranked MIT, falling 4-5. This marked the first MIT victory over Bowdoin since the 1993-1994 season.

In Rhode Island, both Brown squads defeated Virginia. Farther north, the Harvard women shutout Tufts. In Maryland, the Fordham men defeated Johns Hopkins, 5-4. In New York, Columbia defeated the Williams men, 8-1, and women, 9-0. Farther upstate, Cornell faced Franklin & Marshall. The Big Red women shutout their guests. The 13th-ranked Cornell men edged the 15th-ranked Diplomats, 5-4.

Yale began a weekend road trip with a stop in Philadelphia to face Drexel. The Yale women blanked the Dragons. The 5th-ranked Drexel men earned a 5-4 victory over 8th-ranked Yale. This evened the all-time series between the Drexel and Yale men at 1-1.

On Saturday, Amherst hosted the Little Three Championships. Williams won both the men’s and women’s events. This marks the 18th-consecutive Little Three crown for both Ephs’ squads. The Amherst women defeated Wesleyan, 8-1, while the Amherst men edged Wesleyan, 5-4.

MIT and Wellesley travelled to Maine as a pair on Saturday. At Bates, MIT fell to the Bobcat men, 0-9, while the Bates women defeated Wellesley, 8-1. At Colby, the 22nd-ranked Mules earned a 5-4 victory over 20th-ranked MIT. The 25th-ranked Colby women avenged a 4-5 November loss to 22nd-ranked Wellesley with a 9-0 victory.

In Massachusetts, Tufts hosted and defeated both Conn College squads. In Maryland, Fordham defeated William & Mary, Lafayette, and Vanderbilt. In Connecticut, the Trinity women shutout Stanford.

In Providence, RI, a match of bears occurred. The Brown Bears defeated the visiting Bowdoin Polar Bear squads.  Also at Brown, Middlebury and Virginia met. In the women’s match, Virginia shutout Middlebury, while the Virginia men edged the Panthers, 5-4. Virginia also earned shutout victories over both Conn College teams.

The Rochester men, who earned their first #1 ranking in the program’s 59-year history on Friday, hosted 4th-ranked Harvard. Proving once again how competitive college squash is this season, the Crimson defeated Rochester, 6-3.

Also in New York, the Hamilton men visited and defeated Colgate. At the William Smith Round Robin, St. Lawrence and William Smith both defeated the Colgate women, 9-0. The 24th-ranked William Smith Herons edged 19th-ranked St. Lawrence, 5-4.

Yale visited George Washington. The Bulldog men won 7-2, while the Yale women shutout the Colonials. Also on Saturday, the Yale men shutout Navy.

In Pennsylvania, the Dickinson women bested Mount Holyoke, 9-0. The Haverford men shutout Lehigh, while Mount Holyoke defeated the Haverford women, 9-0.

Vassar hosted the Hudson Valley tournament. The Bard men defeated Boston University, 6-3, and Bryant College, 9-0. The Vassar men defeated Vermont, but lost to Boston University. The Vassar women defeated both Boston University and Bucknell.

On Sunday, Bowdoin and Virginia met at Brown. Virginia captured both the men’s and women’s matches. In Maryland, Fordham lost to Duke, 2-7.

In New York, Columbia hosted Cornell. The 8th-ranked Cornell women defeated 7th-ranked Columbia, 5-4. The Columbia men were 8-1 victors over the Big Red. The Stanford women defeated the Cornell women, 7-2. At Vassar, the Brewers fell to the Northeastern men, 2-7.

Hobart and William Smith hosted Hamilton. The Herons defeated Hamilton, 7-2. In the men’s match, 23rd-ranked Hobart defeated 27th-ranked Hamilton, 5-4.

In Philadelphia, Drexel hosted Dartmouth. The 13th-ranked Drexel women came up just short against 9th-ranked Dartmouth, falling 4-5. The Drexel men won 6-3 over the Big Green. At Dickinson, both home squads defeated Denison. The Rochester men visited Lancaster, PA, on Sunday. The Yellowjackets shutout Franklin & Marshall.

The Harvard men visited St. Lawrence. The Crimson remained undefeated with a 6-3 victory over St. Lawrence.

Middlebury travelled to Brown. The Middlebury men won 7-2, while the Brown women were 9-0 victors.

In Maine, both Colby squads defeated Tufts. The men won 8-1, while the 25th-ranked women defeated 18th-ranked Tufts, 7-2. In an evening match, both Bates squads defeated Tufts.

At Dickinson, Haverford and Dickinson defeated both Denison squads. Dickinson also defeated the two Haverford teams.

In club-vs.-club women’s matches, Smith defeated Bard. Rochester defeated Bard.

In club-vs.-club men’s matches, Washington defeated Notre Dame. Lafayette defeated Swarthmore. Washington defeated Minnesota. Washington defeated USC. Vanderbilt defeated Swarthmore. Swarthmore defeated Siena. Duke defeated Swarthmore. Lafayette defeated William & Mary. Washington defeated Cal. Lafayette defeated Penn State.

Schools are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, a minimum number of matches must be played at specific periods of the season:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.

For complete results from all of this weekend’s action, see Women’s Results and Men’s Results.