Home Blog Page 168

2014-2015 Dunlop Women’s College Squash Team Rankings (2/8/2015)

0
[rankingimage] Northampton, MA — Today, the tenth [wtr] of the season were released.

In the final week of the regular season, Harvard defeated Trinity, 8-1. This created a ranking triangle because Penn beat Harvard, 5-4, Trinity beat Penn, 5-4, and Harvard beat Trinity, 8-1. Per the CSA’s ranking rules, the individuals matches won in the triangle were totaled, and Harvard regains the top position, followed by Penn and Trinity.

Haverford edged Boston College, 5-4, to move up a position to 31st. Boston College takes the 32nd position.

Positions 37 – 44 were rearranged with late season victories by Colgate, Fordham, and Boston University.

Full draws and tournament information will be sent to teams later this evening (2/10).

Below are the [wtr] as of February 8, 2015. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking.

  1. Harvard University (3)
  2. Pennsylvania, University of (2)
  3. Trinity College (1)
  4. Princeton University (4)
  5. Yale University (5)
  6. Cornell University (6)
  7. Columbia University (7)
  8. George Washington University (8)
  9. Dartmouth College (9)
  10. Stanford University (10)
  11. Brown University (11)
  12. Williams College (12)
  13. Middlebury College (13)
  14. Franklin and Marshall College (14)
  15. Drexel University (15)
  16. Bates College (16)
  17. Amherst College (17)
  18. Hamilton College (18)
  19. Bowdoin College (19)
  20. St. Lawrence University (20)
  21. Colby College (21)
  22. Wesleyan University (22)
  23. Virginia, University of (23)
  24. Wellesley College (24)
  25. William Smith College (25)
  26. Tufts University (26)
  27. Connecticut College (27)
  28. Mount Holyoke College (28)
  29. Georgetown University (30)
  30. Johns Hopkins University (31)
  31. Haverford College (32)
  32. Boston College (29)
  33. Vassar College (33)
  34. Dickinson College (34)
  35. Bucknell University (35)
  36. Smith College (36)
  37. Northwestern University (39)
  38. Washington University in St. Louis (40)
  39. Colgate University (42)
  40. Rochester, University of (37)
  41. Fordham University (43)*
  42. New York University (38)
  43. Boston University (NR)
  44. Northeastern University (41)
  45. Minnesota, University of (44)

* =  Not competing at Team Championships

Sportsmanship and Refereeing at the 2015 Team Championships

0

College Squash AssociationNorthampton, MA — The College Squash Association prides itself on the sportsmanship of its players, coaches, and fans.

Being mindful of sportsmanship is especially important at the National Team Championships, where emotions can run high. Before the championship season gets underway, the CSA wants to remind all members of the college squash community to be aware of sportsmanship.

One of the unique aspects of college squash is that players officiate matches. The referees for college basketball games, for instance, are hired by schools to officiate. This goes for non-conference regular season games as well as championship finals. In college squash, the players almost always mark and referee, even for major matches.

Marking and refereeing demand sound knowledge of the game, careful attention, and a commitment to fair play. Making the right calls can be challenging even if the referee has no personal connection to the players; making the right call against a teammate and friend when the entire match is on the line is even harder. That so many players do make the right calls in difficult situations should be a point of pride for college squash. That being said, there are times when even the most conscientious players make bad decisions on court or as markers and referees. Such decisions can compromise fair play, ruin the experience for those involved, and reflect poorly on the sport as a whole.

Competing for a national or division title at the National Team Championships puts additional pressure on players, making it harder to uphold high standards of behavior and fair play — and making it all the more important. To make sure these standards are upheld, the College Squash Association has instituted a roving referee system for the men’s and women’s National Team Championships. At each event, there will be a tournament director and a site director.  The roving referees will circulate and observe matches to make sure players, markers, and referees are behaving appropriately. Players will continue to be the primary markers and referees, but the roving referees will issue warnings, strokes, and other penalties as warranted if they observe inappropriate behavior. For the championship semifinals and final (“A” Divisions), the roving referees will officiate the matches. All teams will be warned before play starts that the referees (student or roving official) will move to an automatic stroke at the first sign of abusive behavior.

For championships, players are reminded of the following rules and guidelines:

  • Approved eyewear must be worn in any practice, warm-up, or competition (singles or doubles). Standard eyeglasses may not be worn in lieu of approved eyewear, even if the glasses have plastic lenses. For more information, see Eyewear Rules.
  • Markers and referees are supposed to be neutral. Cheering for teammates while marking or refereeing compromises that neutrality, and markers and referees should not applaud or verbally encourage players. For more information, see Marking/Refereeing.
  • Players should always make their best effort to play the ball rather than playing to create stroke positions. Referees should not reward players who fish for strokes. For more information, see “Best Effort Let and Fishing for Strokes” under Lets/Strokes.
  • Inappropriate on-court conduct includes but is not limited to verbal or physical abuse of an official or player, racquet or equipment abuse, visible or audible obscenity or profanity, and time wasting. For examples of these behaviors, see On-Court Conduct.
  • Players are not permitted to waste time between points or between games, and referees should ensure that play is continuous. Time wasting includes but is not limited to delaying the game by untying and tying shoes, repeatedly wiping eye-wear, walking around the court between points, fixing hair, etc. Players should be reminded that only 90 seconds are allowed between games, and players, markers, and referees should all be on time for the start of the match and of each game. For more information, see On-Court Conduct.

All players on both varsity and club teams should be familiar with the World Squash Federation rules and the CSA’s rules and guidelines, which can be found on CollegeSquashAssociation.com.

Spectators should also be aware of their role in creating an atmosphere for fair play. Examples of inappropriate crowd behaviors include banging on walls during and between points, disruptive talking and cheering during points, and delaying play between points with prolonged cheering. The verbal or physical abuse of players, markers, referees, spectators, or coaches is never acceptable. Making negative comments to markers and referees during, between, or after games is also not acceptable. Spectators who engage in any such behaviors will be warned and may be asked to leave.

2015 Women’s College Squash Richey Award Finalists

Northampton, MA — The Richey Award is given annually to the women’s college squash player who best exemplifies the ideals of squash in her love of and devotion to the game, her strong sense of fairness, and her excellence of play and leadership.

Coaches consult with their teams and vote on the candidates at the Women’s National Team Championships. Each school has two votes: a team vote and a coach’s vote.

The 2014 Richey Award was presented to Catalina Pelaez (Trinity College).

This year, there were many talented nominees. The Executive Committee selected the three finalists for the Richey Award (listed alphabetically; click on the athletes’ names below to see photos and videos of them playing):

Danielle Letourneau (Cornell University): A communications major and international relations minor, Danielle Letourneau has been at the top of the Cornell ladder throughout her four years with the Big Red. In that time, she has been named First Team All-American and All-Ivy League three times (2012, 2013, and 2014). The Canadian has also represented her country in international play. Letourneau, a captain for Cornell the past two seasons, has been ranked amongst the top 10 players in college squash throughout her career.  “She is an outstanding role model to all other collegiate squash players, no matter what their level of play. Her enthusiasm, sportsmanship and competitiveness are for everyone to see when she is out on court representing her Cornell team and collegiate squash,” states Cornell coach Julee Devoy.

Amanda Sobhy (Harvard University): Amanda Sobhy, an anthropology major, is undefeated in collegiate play. She has captured the past three Ramsay Cups (individual titles) and helped Harvard win two national championships (2012 and 2013) and two Ivy League titles (2012 and 2014). She was named the Ivy League Rookie of the Year (2012) and Ivy League Player of the Year (2012, 2013, and 2014). In addition to collegiate play, Sobhy, a New York native, has represented the United States in international competition and competed on the professional circuit as an amateur. “She has brought a new level of recognition to squash worldwide after becoming the first woman to be ranked in world’s top 10 while in college and the first American woman to reach number 8 in the world,” adds Harvard coach Mike Way.

Ashley Tidman (Trinity College): A top-5 player for Trinity throughout her career, Ashely Tidman is a political science major. The Bantams’ co-captain played a pivotal role in Trinity’s 5-4 win over Harvard in last season’s national championship final. In 2013, Tidman was half of the winning pair of the Women’s Intercollegiate Doubles Championship. Tidman, a native of France, has been named a Second Team All-American (2014) and a member of the All-NESCAC teams (2012, 2013, and 2014). According to Trinity coach Wendy Bartlett, “Ashley’s on court poise and demeanor is superlative. While putting pressure on her opponents with powerful shots and quick court coverage, she demonstrates only the highest level of sportsmanship. She has the ability to immediately put her own needs aside and completely focus on what is good for the team or for another player on the team.”

Around the Courts: College Squash Highlights (2/8/2015)

0

College Squash AssociationNorthampton, MA — With the majority of teams wrapping up the college squash regular season this week, there were many crucial matches.

On Monday, the University of Virginia men hosted and defeated Richmond.

In upstate New York on Tuesday, Hobart and William Smith hosted Hamilton. Hobart defeated the Continentals, 6-3, while the Hamilton women defeated the Herons, 9-0.

On Wednesday, Colby hosted Bates. Both Bobcats squads defeated Colby. Also on Wednesday, MIT defeated Northeastern, 8-1, and Amherst defeated Mount Holyoke, 8-1. Both Brown teams lost to Yale.

In a highly anticipated rematch from last season’s national championship final, the top-ranked Trinity women visited 3rd-ranked Harvard. The Crimson defended their home courts, winning 8-1.

On Friday, Drexel hosted and defeated both Dickinson squads. George Washington defeated the Franklin & Marshall women, but lost to the F&M men. MIT traveled to the Mid Atlantic. The Engineers defeated Johns Hopkins 7-2. Lehigh defeated the Boston College men, 6-3.

On Saturday, George Washington split matches with Drexel. The George Washington women defeated the Dragons, 6-3, while the Drexel men defeated the Colonials, 5-4. Both George Washington and Drexel squads defeated Virginia.

Haverford hosted a number of teams on Saturday. The Haverford women defeated Boston College, 5-4, and Bucknell, 7-2. Not to be outdone, the Haverford men defeated Swarthmore, 9-0, and Boston College, 5-4. William Smith shut out both Rochester and Colgate.

Continuing their Mid Atlantic trip, MIT defeated Virginia, 6-3. This was the Engineers’ second victory against a higher ranked opponent on the weekend.

Bard and Vassar met for the third time this season. Last week, Bard ended Vassar’s 30-match winning streak (dating back to 1988) against the Raptors. This week, Vassar captured the match, 6-3.

The Ivy League season concluded with a flurry of matches. On Friday, the Dartmouth men defeated Brown, 6-3, while the Big Green women shutout Brown. Columbia visited Princeton. The Lions’ men defeated Princeton, 6-3, while the Tigers’ women won, 9-0. Both Penn squads hosted and defeated Cornell. The Harvard men and women defeated Yale.

On Sunday, Harvard defeated both Brown teams.  Similarly, the Yale squads defeated Dartmouth. The Princeton women defeated Cornell, 8-1, while the Cornell men defeated Princeton, 5-4. Penn and Columbia traded matches. The Lions’ men defeated Penn, 7-2, while the Quaker women wrapped up an undefeated season with a 9-0 win against Columbia.

The Penn women won the Ivy League title, their third ever. The Harvard men earned their 40th conference crown.

On Saturday, the Seven Sisters Championship, was held at Harvard with Wellesley serving as the host. The event featured Mount Holyoke, Smith, Vassar, and Wellesley. Wellesley repeated as tournament champions by defeating the other three participants in round robin play. Mount Holyoke defeated Smith and Vassar to take second, while Vassar defeated Smith to finish in third place.

This weekend, the NESCAC Championships were held at Williams College. In women’s action on Friday, Colby edged Wesleyan, 5-4; Hamilton swept Conn College; and Bowdoin blanked Tufts. In the quarterfinals on Saturday, Trinity defeated Colby, 8-1; Bates defeated Amherst, 6-3; Middlebury defeated Hamilton, 9-0; and Williams defeated Bowdoin, 9-0. In the semifinals, Trinity advanced with a 9-0 victory over Bates, while Williams defeated Middlebury, 6-3. On Sunday, Trinity earned their ninth consecutive NESCAC title with a 9-0 victory over Williams. Middlebury defeated Bates, 7-2, to finish in third place. Here is the order of finish for the women’s tournament: 1. Trinity; 2. Williams; 3. Middlebury; 4. Bates; 5. Amherst; 6. Hamilton; 7. Bowdoin; 8. Colby; 9. Wesleyan; 10. Tufts; and 11. Conn College.

In the men’s tournament on Friday, Bowdoin defeated Hamilton, 8-1; Wesleyan swept Tufts; and Amherst defeated Conn College, 8-1. In Saturday’s quarterfinals, Trinity defeated Bowdoin, 8-1; Bates defeated Colby, 8-1; Middlebury edged Wesleyan, 5-4; and Williams defeated Amherst, 6-3. In the semifinals, Trinity defeated Bates, 7-2, and Williams topped Middlebury, 5-4. On Sunday, Trinity defeated Williams, 9-0, to remain unbeaten in all nine NESCAC championships. Bates defeated Middlebury to finish in third place. Here is the order of finish for the men’s tournament: 1. Trinity; 2. Williams; 3. Bates; 4. Middlebury; 5. Wesleyan; 6. Colby; 7. Bowdoin; 8. Amherst; 9. Hamilton; 10. Conn College; and 11. Tufts.

Coaches and Team Contacts, please remember to enter your team’s results in the US Squash Scoring System on the day of each match. Each player must be named in the results (“Not on Roster” entries will not be tolerated) or penalties may be applied.

Schools are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, a minimum number of matches must be played at specific periods of the season:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Except for Emerging Teams, matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.

For complete results from all of this weekend’s action, see Women’s Results and Men’s Results.

College Squash Reminder (2/6/2015)

0

Northampton, MA — On Friday, the e-mail below was sent to coaches and team contacts.

Coaches, Team Contacts, and SIDs:
Here are a few reminders
  • Women’s Team Rankings: Women’s team rankings will be reviewed on Sunday night so that the rankings may be released and the Team Championship draws may be finalized. All women’s teams should enter their match scores ASAP after this weekend’s matches (Sunday, 6 PM ET, at the latest).
  • WCSA Championship Roster Submissions: All teams participating in the 2015 Women’s Team Championships must submit their final roster order by Monday, February 9, 2015 at 12:00pm Eastern Time (noon). For any roster questions, please contact Dent Wilkens ([email protected]).
  • Men’s Team Rankings: Rankings will be reviewed on Monday evening (6 PM ET). If your results are not posted to the US Squash Scoring System, they will not be considered for ranking purposes. Without results in the US Squash Scoring System, your team will not be credited appropriately. At most, you have 48 hours after a match is played to submit results. In addition, the sooner results are submitted to the US Squash Scoring System, the greater the chance that your team will be mentioned in the Sunday evening “Around the Courts” article.
  • Awards: Last call for award nominations and scholar athlete/academic recognition honors. During the week of team championships, varsity teams receive online award ballots.

  • Club Teams NOT participating in Team Championships: The following club teams have not declared for team championships. Please contact Dent Wilkens ([email protected]) if this is a mistake and to inquire if there is still room for your squad at the event.
    • WCSA Club Teams NOT Participating: Denison University; Fordham University; North Carolina, University of; Notre Dame, University of; and Rochester, University of
    • MCSA Club Teams NOT Participating: Brandeis University; Duke University; Lafayette College; Lehigh University; North Carolina, University of; Sewanee: University of the South
  • Harrow Sports Player of the Week: Please nominate deserving players for Player of the Week honors by 6 PM ET on Monday.
    • Criteria: A Player of the Week should have a significant impact on his or her team’s performance during the prior week and demonstrate sportsmanship.
    • Nominations: Coaches, Sports Information Directors, and Team Contacts may nominate players by using the following link.
  • Match Results with “Not on Roster” players: As a reminder, make sure your results include all players who participated in the match. Like last season, we are prepared to remove teams from the rankings if “Not on Roster” players are not entered. Please contact Dent Wilkens ([email protected]) if you need assistance fixing match results with “Not on Roster” players.
  • Minimum # of Players: For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Except for Emerging Teams, matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships. If a match was not played, enter it as a “double default.”
  • Instructions for US Squash Scoring System: Here are links to the instructions on how to add/remove players from your rosters and enter match results. If you need to be added as the contact in the US SquashScoring System, please contact Dent Wilkens ([email protected]).
  • Qualifications for Team Nationals: 
    • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
    • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9 player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.
    • Unless a petition for an exemption is made to the Tournament Director, teams must submit and bring at least 9 players to Team Championships.

Drexel Revisits Middlebury

0

On January 30, 2015, Middlebury hosted Drexel. Middlebury assistant coach Brian Cady wrote this article as a follow up to a 2012 article by Middlebury’s late coach, John Illig.

drexel-middleburyMiddlebury, VT — The temperature outside was hovering just above 0 degrees, the sky was darkening, and a winter storm was blowing snowflakes sideways at gusts of 30 miles-per-hour.  But squash (luckily for us here in Vermont) is an indoor game and inside the Panther squads (both men and women) were happily warming up in preparation for their 5 pm match against Drexel University.

To better paint this contrasting picture it is helpful to be familiar with the new Middlebury squash facility.  Completed in October of 2013, the structure houses nine courts formed around a large central viewing walkway below a skylight and all glass walls at the facility entrance.  The lobby outside the entrance is equally transparent with two outside walls being all glass.  Without going into more detail, someone there at the time could turn one direction to watch a winter storm howling across the northern tundra and the other to view 30 student-athletes laughing, sweating and sometimes dancing (the sound system is usually blaring before big matches) in preparation for Drexel.

Drexel had not yet arrived.  Their bus trip from Philadelphia was hindered by traffic, storm related accidents, and bus breakdowns.  After almost 8 hours of driving, the last 3 of which were dominated by winter storm swept rural highway, it must have come as a shock for some on the Drexel team to suddenly enter a warm, bright and loud squash facility that by all appearances was located three hours into the middle of nowhere.

Drexel did, however, have a few things working in their favor in regards to that evening’s match up.  Namely that they were the 12th-ranked and 14th-ranked teams in the country (men’s and women’s respectively) and were coached by former world #1 John White.  They were a talented, well coached and battle-proven team from top to bottom.  Any idea of victory in the eye of a realist was more of a dream than a goal.  After all, the Middlebury men’s team was ranked 17th in the country and a jump of 5 positions in this day and age of college squash does not really happen.  The women, on the other hand, had a much more reasonable shot at victory, having just been moved to 13th in the rankings.  They would go on to cement their new ranking with a 6-3 victory that evening over Drexel.

By the time the Drexel teams arrived with coaches John White and Kelsey Engman, we had already agreed to push back the start time of the match to allow for a proper warm-up.   Everyone was set for the start of the match. But someone was missing that evening.

John Illig (“JI”) the Middlebury men’s and women’s squash coach for the past seven seasons and driver behind the creation of the new facility that was sheltering us from the winter storm, had passed away suddenly and tragically last summer before the start of the season.  Initial emotions of shock, despair, disbelief, and sorrow experienced by team members and alumni have evolved into nostalgia, remembrance, and a bittersweet sentiment for John’s life, through the repeated exposure to stories, memories, and events that remind us of JI.  The team has banded together and grown closer than I ever experienced during my years in the program.

John was once quoted as saying, “I doubt that my place is to impart wisdom or pass down life knowledge to my squash players, but if there’s one lesson I wish I could give them it was just that they don’t need to be or become anything.  If they can be decent and kind, then I already love them for who they are.”  This quote gives someone that might not have gotten to know John Illig a good idea of his character.  He will be missed by those he coached and his character forever honored by those who join the Middlebury squash program.

The night before the match, Reed Palmer, the 2014-15 co-captain of the men’s team, sent the team an email with a link to an article titled, “Drexel Visits Middlebury” written by John after Middlebury’s last home match against Drexel in 2012. John’s article describes in intricate JI detail (as only someone who has read something written by John can understand) the play by play of the last home Middlebury-Drexel encounter.  Please feel free to read the article. In short, the match was all but lost until then-sophomore Robert Galluccio (our other 2014-15 co-captain of the men’s team) made a impossible comeback from 2-1 down in games and 8-2 down in points in the fourth.  That, combined with an improbable win from a newly injured Jay Dolan, saw Middlebury take the match 5-4.  Needless to say the article, along with Reed’s own inspiring words, put the team in the right mind-set to give Drexel men a great fight the following day.

With the email from the night before stoking emotions of nostalgia, the men showed up with an attitude of resolute determination.  Knowing the improbability of a win, I had the good sense to keep my mouth shut and let them focus on the words of interim head-coach Mike Morgan: “Let’s make the next three hours the longest three hours of these guys’ lives.”  They took these words to heart.

Introductions were lengthened on that day to respect “Senior Day” or the senior’s last home match of the season.  While the women had cards, flowers and poems prepared, the men kept their acknowledgements short.  When asked before the match if co-captain Rob Galluccio was offended that his teammates didn’t get him flowers he responded, “All I want today are W’s.”

Wyatt French, playing in the #3 position, blasted out of the gate with a 3-0 “W” over top-50 college squash player Ibrahim Bakir.  With blistering pace and sheer determination, Wyatt quietly produced a result that simply should not have been and boosted Panther confidence along with it.  At the #9 position, Cam Dewey took care of business and pulled out a win in four games.

On the center court, the #6 match had not even finished its third game.  Eventually going to five games, this was one of the longest matches I’ve ever watched.  Both players refused to stop running, and neither wanted to make a mistake.  Their styles were those of attrition, and they were evenly matched.  Middlebury’s David Cromwell ended up taking the match 11-9 in the fifth, ending with the longest point I’ve seen in my life.  The point went on for five minutes. Teammates recall going to warm-up, coming back and the same match-point still going on.  Cromwell ended it finally with a perfect drop shot.  After the match was over he said, “I told myself before the serve that this next point was going to be the longest of his guy’s life.”  He was right.

We were only up 3-0 for a short time.  Our #2, Andrew Cadienhead, was defeated in four games shortly after Cromwell’s epic five-gamer.  We needed two more wins to clinch a team victory, and it wasn’t looking good.  Our #1 match up was going to be a long shot due to the strength of the Drexel #1.  Our #4, Harrison Croll, had injured his ankle the weekend before, and this was his first time back on court for a match.  Our #7, Will Hanley, had separated his shoulder over break and then pulled his groin the week before; this was also his first time back on court.  And our #8, Robert Gallucio, was 2-1 down in his match. Although we got off to a great start, the next two match wins were looking like they were going to be hard to get.  On top of that, the Drexel team had suddenly started to take each match very seriously as they were fully aware of the position they were in.  It was at this point, similar to the position John Illig described in the “Drexel Visits Middlebury” article, the match was not looking like it was going to go our way.  I resigned myself to taking positives out of our great start and solid individual match victories against a team ranked #12 in the country.

But then Galluccio rallied.  He started playing at a relentless pace and overwhelmed the Drexel #8.  He cruised to victory in the fifth game just like he did two years ago against Drexel.  It was a very impressive win for him, and it came at exactly the right time.

With only one “W” needed to take the match there was suddenly electricity in the air.  Will Kurth (#5) was down 2-1 on the center court. Everyone was watching recently injured #7 Will Hanley as he cruised to 2-0 up against his opponent.  With his injuries looming Hanley fought hard and pulled out the third game for the last win needed to clinch the match.  After respectfully shaking hands, he was mobbed by the rest of team that had just achieved a victory over the highest ranked team in our men’s program’s history.

John Illig was a man of contrasting personality traits.  On the one hand he was incredibly outdoorsy and fond of nature, (he has hiked the height of the continental USA three times), yet he coached a strictly indoor game in a regulated environment.  JI was “anti-establishment,” but he chose to coach squash, traditionally played by people who are “part of the system,” if you will.  John was kind and gentle, but he was simultaneously a ruthless competitor who was focused on winning.

As the remaining matches finished up, the winter storm outside was still raging.  A desolate, unwelcoming, and harsh landscape contrasted with the warm, emotional environment of the squash courts.  That moment would have suited John well.  He would have appreciated ruminating about the match’s comment on circular history equally as much as the five hard-earned W’s produced by his Middlebury men.

2014-2015 Dunlop Men’s College Squash Team Rankings (2/1/2015)

0
[rankingimage] Northampton, MA — Today, the ninth [mtr] of the season were released.

The top 11 ranking positions remain in flux. After Franklin & Marshall’s 5-4 victory over Rochester, there were seven ranking triangles in play. Trinity and Rochester remained in the top two positions. Harvard’s victory over Columbia vaulted the Crimson into the 3rd position, followed by Columbia, then Yale. In the Rochester, Franklin & Marshall, and Princeton triangle, Rochester finished first, followed by Franklin & Marshall, which moved Rochester to 6th, F&M to 7th, and Princeton to 8th.  Penn and Dartmouth each moved up one position after Dartmouth edged Cornell, 5-4.

Not to be outdone, the 12th – 18th positions were also complicated.  A ranking triangle between Drexel, Williams, and Middlebury formed this week after Middlebury defeated Drexel, 5-4. Drexel won the triangle, followed by Williams, and then Drexel. Navy was slotted between Williams and Middlebury, while Brown, George Washington, and Bates took 16th, 17th, and 18th.

With Amherst’s 5-4 victory over Wesleyan, yet another ranking triangle was formed between Amherst, Colby, and Wesleyan. Colby had the most individual victories of the triangle, followed by Wesleyan, and then Amherst. Colby takes the 20th position, followed by Wesleyan and Amherst.

Bucknell moves to 29th after a late-reported victory over Georgetown. Chicago’s victory over Georgetown and Johns Hopkins moved the Maroons to the 30th position.

Boston College’s late-reported victory over Colgate created a ranking triangle between Boston College, Bryant, and Colgate.  BC won the triangle, followed by Bryant and Colgate.

After both defeating Lehigh, Haverford moves up to 43rd, while Fordham moves up to 44th.

After defeating Cal Berkeley, Minnesota moves to the 53rd position.

Bard and Vassar switch positions. Bard ended a 28-match losing streak on Saturday by defeating Brandeis, 9-0, and Vassar, 5-4.

USC moves behind Oregon after losing to the Ducks, 2-5.

Brandeis debuts in the rankings this week.

North Carolina and Sewanee were removed from the rankings due to “Not on Roster” players in their match results. They received multiple warnings. They will reenter the rankings in the ranking cycle after they enter the players in the US Squash scoring system for the matches with “Not on Roster” players.

Teams are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, they must meet minimum match requirements:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9 player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Except for Emerging Teams, matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.

Below are the [mtr] as of February 1, 2014. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking.

  1. Trinity College (1)
  2. St. Lawrence University (2)
  3. Harvard University (6)
  4. Columbia University (4)
  5. Yale University (5)
  6. Rochester, University of (3)
  7. Franklin and Marshall College (9)
  8. Princeton University (8)
  9. Pennsylvania, University of (10)
  10. Dartmouth College (11)
  11. Cornell University (7)
  12. Drexel University (12)
  13. Williams College (15)
  14. Naval Academy (14)
  15. Middlebury College (17)
  16. Brown University (13)
  17. George Washington University (16)
  18. Bates College (18)
  19. Western Ontario, University of (19)
  20. Colby College (21)
  21. Wesleyan University (20)
  22. Amherst College (22)
  23. Hobart College (23)
  24. Bowdoin College (24)
  25. Hamilton College (25)
  26. Connecticut College (26)
  27. Stanford University (27)
  28. Virginia, University of (28)
  29. Bucknell University (30)
  30. Chicago, University of (42)
  31. Georgetown University (29)
  32. Johns Hopkins University (31)
  33. Tufts University (32)
  34. MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (33)
  35. Denison University (34)
  36. Northeastern University (36)
  37. Boston College (38)
  38. Bryant University (39)
  39. Colgate University (37)
  40. Boston University (40)
  41. New York University (41)
  42. Northwestern University (43)
  43. Haverford College (44)
  44. Fordham University (47)
  45. Lehigh University (35)*
  46. Washington University (St. Louis) (45)
  47. Miami, University of (46)
  48. Richmond, University of (48)
  49. Charleston, College of (49)
  50. Pennsylvania State University (50)
  51. Washington, University of (51)
  52. Swarthmore College (52)
  53. Minnesota, University of (54)
  54. California Berkeley, University of (53)
  55. Dickinson College (55)
  56. Siena College (58)
  57. Bard College (59)
  58. Vassar College (57)
  59. Davidson College (60)
  60. Vanderbilt University (61)
  61. Notre Dame, University of (62)
  62. Vermont, University of (64)
  63. Oregon, University of (66)
  64. Southern California (USC), University of (56)
  65. Duke University (65)*
  66. Lafayette College (67)*
  67. Ithaca College (NR)
  68. Brandeis University (NR)*

* =  Not competing at Team Championships

2014-2015 Dunlop Women’s College Squash Team Rankings (2/1/2015)

0
[rankingimage] Northampton, MA — Today, the ninth [wtr] of the season were released.

After Princeton’s 5-4 victory over Yale, the two teams switch positions in this week’s rankings. Princeton moves to 4th, while Yale moves to 5th.

Columbia’s victory over Dartmouth created a ranking triangle between Columbia, Dartmouth, and George Washington. This season, Columbia defeated Dartmouth, 6-3; Dartmouth defeated George Washington, 5-4; and George Washington defeated Columbia, 5-4. According to the CSA ranking rules, in this situation, the individual matches won are used to break the tie: Columbia won 10 individual matches, George Washington won 9, and Dartmouth won 8. Columbia assumes the 7th position, followed by George Washington and then Dartmouth.

Similarly, there was a ranking triangle between Conn College, Mount Holyoke, and Tufts for the 26th-28th positions. The three teams all tied with 9 individual victories apiece, so the more recent matches were used to break the tie. Since Tufts defeated Conn College 6-3 on Sunday and Conn College defeated Mount Holyoke last Wednesday, Tufts was awarded the 26th position, followed by Conn College, and Mount Holyoke.

After going 1-1 in two matches with Northwestern on Saturday, Washington in St. Louis moves up to 40th.

Teams are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, they must meet minimum match requirements:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9 player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Except for Emerging Teams, matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.

Below are the [wtr] as of February 1, 2015. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking.

  1. Trinity College (1)
  2. Pennsylvania, University of (2)
  3. Harvard University (3)
  4. Princeton University (5)
  5. Yale University (4)
  6. Cornell University (6)
  7. Columbia University (9)
  8. George Washington University (8)
  9. Dartmouth College (7)
  10. Stanford University (10)
  11. Brown University (11)
  12. Williams College (12)
  13. Middlebury College (13)
  14. Franklin and Marshall College (14)
  15. Drexel University (15)
  16. Bates College (16)
  17. Amherst College (17)
  18. Hamilton College (18)
  19. Bowdoin College (19)
  20. St. Lawrence University (20)
  21. Colby College (21)
  22. Wesleyan University (22)
  23. Virginia, University of (23)
  24. Wellesley College (24)
  25. William Smith College (25)
  26. Tufts University (28)
  27. Connecticut College (27)
  28. Mount Holyoke College (26)
  29. Boston College (29)
  30. Georgetown University (30)
  31. Johns Hopkins University (31)
  32. Haverford College (32)
  33. Vassar College (33)
  34. Dickinson College (34)
  35. Bucknell University (35)
  36. Smith College (36)
  37. Rochester, University of (37)*
  38. New York University (38)
  39. Northwestern University (39)
  40. Washington University in St. Louis (43)
  41. Northeastern University (40)
  42. Colgate University (41)
  43. Fordham University (42)*
  44. Minnesota, University of (44)
  45. Notre Dame, University of (45)*

* =  Not competing at Team Championships

Harrow Sports College Squash Player of the Week (2/1/2015)

[powimage]

Northampton, MA — For the week ending 2/1/2015, Princeton’s Kira Keating and Bard’s Satwik Srikrishnan have been named the women’s and men’s [hpow].

A [hpow] should have a significant impact on his or her team’s performance during the prior week and demonstrate sportsmanship. Coaches and Sports Information Directors may nominate players.

Kira Keating (Princeton University): Princeton visited New Haven on Sunday. The 5th-ranked Tigers were looking edge 4th-ranked Yale and gain some momentum going into the final few weeks of the season. Every individual match was crucial for both teams. At the match at the #8 position, first-year students Kira Keating (Princeton) and Jocelyn Lehman (Yale) faced off. Lehman grabbed the first game, but Keating came back to take a 2-1 lead. In the fourth, Lehman evened the match with a 12-10 win. Keating captured the match in five games (6-11, 11-9, 11-6, 10-12, and 11-6) to help Princeton earn a 5-4 win over the Bulldogs.

Satwik Srikrishnan (Bard College): At the Hudson Valley Team Invitational over the weekend, Bard and Vassar met to decide the title. In the match at the #9 position, Bard sophomore Satwik Srikrishnan faced Vassar junior Tim Boycott. After four games, including two games that were settled in tiebreakers, Srikrishnan captured the fifth game and the individual match (11-6, 12-10, 4-11, 13-15, and 11-7). This victory helped Bard capture the match against Vassar, 5-4. Earlier in the day, Bard snapped its 28-match losing streak by beating Brandeis.