Home Blog Page 134

Around the Courts: College Squash Highlights (1/24/2016)

0

College Squash AssociationHatfield, MA — Despite the snow blanketing much of the east coast, college squash was in full swing this week.

The week began with St. Lawrence visiting Harvard. The Crimson women shutout their guests, 9-0. In the men’s match, the Saints earned a 5-4 victory over higher-ranked Harvard.

In a showdown of Connecticut powers on Wednesday, Yale hosted Trinity. Trinity made themselves very comfortable in New Haven and captured both the men’s and women’s matches, 8-1.

Farther down in Connecticut, Conn College hosted Wellesley. The Camels came up just short, dropping a 4-5 match to Wellesley.

With snow covering the Mid Atlantic states, the following varsity teams had matches cancelled or postponed for Friday – Sunday: Amherst, Bates, Colby, Columbia, Conn College, Dickinson, Drexel, Franklin & Marshall, George Washington, Haverford, Tufts (men), and Vassar.

On Friday, William Smith visited Mount Holyoke. The Herons defeated Mount Holyoke, 6-3. Farther east in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MIT shutout both Boston College and Boston University.

Beginning on Friday, Wesleyan hosted a number of teams. The Cardinals faced Bowdoin in the opening match in Middletown, CT. The Wesleyan men defeated the Polar Bears, 5-4, while the Bowdoin women defeated Wesleyan, 6-3. The Bowdoin men started their second match of the evening at close to 8:30 PM. With the teams tied at 4-4, Bowdoin pulled out a five-game victory at the #4 position, to clinch the match, 5-4, and send both teams back to their hotels at 11:20 PM!

Harvard welcomed Rochester to the Murr Center on Saturday. The 5th-ranked Yellowjackets were down 1-4 after five matches, but they battled back to even the match. Rochester won the final match to hand Harvard their second consecutive 5-4 loss.

Also in Boston, MIT continued their winning ways. The Engineers defeated Northeastern and Northwestern.

Mount Holyoke concluded their home schedule with a loss to Tufts, 3-6. Tufts, the 26th-ranked team, also edged 24th-ranked William Smith, 5-4. Wellesley defeated both William Smith and Smith. William Smith also defeated Smith.

St. Lawrence hosted Cornell. The Saints and the Big Red traded matches. St. Lawrence captured the men’s match, 8-1, while the Cornell won the women’s match, 9-0.

The Wesleyan men went 2-0 on Saturday. They defeated Hobart, 6-3, and Hamilton, 8-1. The Hamilton women defeated Wesleyan, 8-1, but lost to Bowdoin, 3-6. The Bowdoin men also defeated Hamilton 8-1.

Middlebury travelled to Williamstown to face NESCAC rival Williams. The Panthers and the Ephs traded matches. In the women’s match, Williams won, 7-2, while in the men’s match, Middlebury prevailed, 7-2.

Trinity hosted Penn in a noontime match. The top-ranked Bantam men were 8-1 victors. In the women’s match, Trinity was ahead 2-1 after the first wave of matches, but the Quakers pulled ahead 4-2 after the second wave. In the final three matches, which included a injury retirement for Penn’s #1 after the second game, the Quakers escaped with a 5-4 victory. Later in the afternoon, the Trinity men also earned an 8-1 victory over Hobart.

On Sunday, Bowdoin hosted and lost to both Brown squads, 0-9.

Trinity hosted Rochester. Tied at 4-4, the match came down to the 5th game between the #1 players. Trinity captured the final game, 11-9, and the match to defend their home courts.

In club-vs.-club men’s team action, Minnesota defeated Oregon, 7-2, and Cal, 8-1; Washington defeated USC, 7-2; and Notre Dame, 8-1. The Northwestern women defeated Minnesota, and Colgate defeated Smith.

Coaches and Team Contacts, please remember to enter your team’s results in the US Squash Scoring System on the day of each match. Each player must be named in the results (“Not on Roster” entries will not be tolerated) or penalties may be applied.

Schools are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, a minimum number of matches must be played at specific periods of the season:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Except for Emerging Teams, matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.

For complete results from all of this weekend’s action, see Women’s Results and Men’s Results.

2015-2016 Dunlop Men’s College Squash Team Rankings (1/17/2016)

0
[rankingimage] Hatfield, MA — Today, the sixth [mtr] of the season were released.

The top-8 positions are again in flux this week. After Rochester’s 5-4 victory over previously #2-ranked Yale, Rochester moved up to 5th, while Yale moved to 6th. Watch for the top-8 positions to change again next week.

The 15th and 16th ranking positions switched. Middlebury’s 5-4 victory over Brown moved the Panthers to 15th.

MIT’s victory over Dickinson, 7-2, moved the Engineers up to the 25th ranking position, followed by Dickinson and Tufts.

As a reminder, the College Squash Association updated its ranking rules for the 2015 – 2016 season. Varsity teams are ranked throughout the season (manually until January 25th when a computer algorithm has enough data to rank teams), while club and emerging club programs will only be ranked the week before Team Championships.

Teams are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, they must meet minimum match requirements:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9 player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

Below are the [mtr] as of January 17, 2016. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking.

  1. Trinity College (1)
  2. Pennsylvania, University of (3)
  3. Harvard University (4)
  4. Dartmouth College (5)
  5. Rochester, University of (7)
  6. Yale University (2)
  7. St. Lawrence University (6)
  8. Columbia University (8)
  9. Drexel University (9)
  10. Franklin & Marshall College (10)
  11. Princeton University (11)
  12. Cornell University (12)
  13. George Washington University (13)
  14. Naval Academy (14)
  15. Middlebury College (16)
  16. Brown University (15)
  17. Bates College (17)
  18. Williams College (18)
  19. Wesleyan University (19)
  20. Colby College (20)
  21. Bowdoin College (21)
  22. Amherst College (22)
  23. Western Ontario, University of (23)
  24. Hobart College (24)
  25. MIT (27)
  26. Dickinson College (25)
  27. Tufts University (26)
  28. Hamilton College (28)
  29. Connecticut College (29)
  30. Haverford College (30)
  31. Fordham University (31)
  32. Bard College (32)
  33. Vassar College (33)

2015-2016 Dunlop Women’s College Squash Team Rankings (1/17/2016)

0
[rankingimage]Hatfield, MA — Today, the sixth [wtr] of the season were released.

After Columbia’s first-ever victory over Cornell, the Lions and Big Red switched positions. Columbia assumes the 7th ranking position, while Cornell moves to the 8th ranking position.

With Drexel’s victory over Dartmouth and Williams’ win over George Washington, the 9th – 13th positions changed. Drexel takes over the 9th position, followed by Dartmouth, Williams, Brown, and George Washington.

Franklin & Marshall’s victory over Middlebury moved the Diplomats into the 14th ranking position.

Positions 20 – 23 were shuffled once again. Colby’s victory over Wesleyan and St. Lawrence’s victory over Wellesley moved Colby to the 20th position, followed by St. Lawrence, Wellesley, and Wesleyan.

As a reminder, the College Squash Association updated its ranking rules for the 2015 – 2016 season. Varsity teams are ranked throughout the season (manually until January 25th when a computer algorithm has enough data to rank teams), while club and emerging club programs will only be ranked the week before Team Championships.

Teams are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, they must meet minimum match requirements:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9 player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

Below are the [wtr] as of January 17, 2016. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking.

  1. Harvard University (1)
  2. Pennsylvania, University of (2)
  3. Princeton University (3)
  4. Yale University (4)
  5. Stanford University (5)
  6. Trinity College (6)
  7. Columbia University (8)
  8. Cornell University (7)
  9. Drexel University (12)
  10. Dartmouth College (9)
  11. Williams College (13)
  12. Brown University (11)
  13. George Washington University (10)
  14. Franklin and Marshall College (15)
  15. Middlebury College (14)
  16. Amherst College (16)
  17. Bowdoin College (17)
  18. Bates College (18)
  19. Hamilton College (19)
  20. Colby College (22)
  21. St. Lawrence University (23)
  22. Wellesley College (21)
  23. Wesleyan University (20)
  24. William Smith College (24)
  25. Dickinson College (25)
  26. Tufts University (26)
  27. Mount Holyoke College (27)
  28. Connecticut College (28)
  29. Vassar College (29)
  30. Haverford College (30)

Harrow Sports College Squash Player of the Week (1/17/2016)

[powimage]

Hatfield, MA — For the week ending 1/17/2016, Drexel’s Ryan Morgan and Rochester’s Tomotaka Endo have been named the women’s and men’s [hpow].

A [hpow] should have a significant impact on his or her team’s performance during the prior week and demonstrate sportsmanship. Coaches and Sports Information Directors may nominate players.

Ryan Morgan (Drexel University): On Saturday, Drexel visited Dartmouth. With the match tied at 4-4, #3s Ryan Morgan (Drexel) and Rebecca Brownell (Darmouth) began their fourth game. Morgan was down 1-2 in games but regained control of the match. She won the final two games to capture the individual (9-11, 11-7, 7-11, 11-4, and 11-2) and team match. This was Drexel’s first victory over Dartmouth, and according to head coach John White, “Our biggest win to date.”

Tomotaka Endo (University of Rochester): With every regular season match being critical for teams competing for the Potter Cup (national championship), Sunday’s meeting between 7th-ranked Rochester and 2nd-ranked Yale was important. Visiting Yale was up 4-3 in matches and on the verge of victory. Rochester tied it at 4-4, and the team match came down to the #4s, Rochester’s Tomotaka Endo and Yale’s Kah Wah Cheong. Endo rallied from a 1-2 game deficit to tie the match at two games a piece, setting up a one-game winner-take-all, for the individual and team match. Endo won the match (5-11, 11-5, 11-13, 11-3, and 11-6) to give the Yellowjackets their first regular season victory over Yale.

 

Drexel’s Squash Teams Visit the Cayman Islands

0

Laura Rahauser, a Drexel senior, reports on the team’s winter training trip to the Cayman Islands.

Drexel UniversityCayman Islands — Our team was casually having dinner at “Stingers,” a poolside restaurant that was conveniently footsteps away from our hotel. “Cheers to making it this far, Cheers to our senior season,” my teammate, Joey Gingold said to me as we clinked our plastic ribbed water cups and exchanged smiles with the rest of the group sitting at our table.

This will be my fourth and last year on the Drexel women’s squash team, and I am extremely grateful to be a captain of this group of people. When it was announced we would be traveling to the Cayman Islands to train for some of our 2015-2016 winter break, I knew that it would be a great opportunity for Drexel squash. Not only would be escaping to the beach and return with glowing tans but even more noticeably, we would have the chance to acknowledge the amount of hard work we put into our sport.

drexelcaymansquashclubWhile we were there we worked hard for ourselves, but it became more obvious that as we devoted to the same schedule, we recognized each other. I think this is one of the things that I felt was most satisfying. The men and women do not normally practice together, and the opportunity to watch the men’s half of the team was inspiring. I couldn’t help but respect their work ethic. I believe that when one person works hard, it becomes contagious.

Each day started with a team breakfast as everyone, still sore and half asleep, limped and crawled their way out of bed downstairs. After breakfast we had a fifteen minute drive down a beautiful coast to the courts. The drives were some of my favorite memories as we blasted classics with the windows down as the locals couldn’t help but smile and laugh as we passed by. We’d have a morning session at the South Sound Squash Club that lasted a couple hours. One hour of tough fitness and the other hour of squash. After our morning session we’d recover with some beach time. Throwing the rugby ball in the ocean and napping on the beach is what most afternoons consisted of. Around 4 we’d head back to the courts for an afternoon session. The coaches split us into two teams, Blue and Gold. Each team consisted of both men and women ,and every session the coaches would decide a winner based on performance, effort, and so on. A little friendly competition made every session pretty interesting. I remember face planting into the muddy bushes as I finished a relay race… I was so into the race I forgot I had to stop! The evenings consisted of team dinners at wonderful restaurants and some more beach/hot tub time. Not a worry in the world for us. Each day we grew closer as a team as we laughed, played, struggled, and enjoyed every minute of it together.

drexelcaymanwaterThe training sessions were tough and the time on the beach was cherished. Our meals were delicious and it was quite special to share a meal with my team every evening. To this day, I still miss it!

If I had the opportunity to go again, I would use more sunblock. Other than that, I would not change much about my experience. I enjoyed being in an environment without much to worry about with the exception of squash, sleep, sun and food. Our main focus seemed dedicated to each other and improving as a unit.

Every year I have loved my experience as a member of the Drexel squash team, but this group might be my favorite. I feel that this team has proved a great deal of perseverance despite our losses and disappointments. Not only am I proud to be on a team with athleticism and clear talent – but one with a lot of integrity, good character, charisma and diversity. I’d compare Drexel squash to a bee-hive. Each person works hard for the benefit of the hive as a whole.

So, as Joey clinked my plastic water cup against the rest, I nodded my head toward the table in agreement. I am very proud to have made it this far, and many cheers to not only my senior season, but to the bright future of Drexel squash.

College Squash Reminder (1/17/2016)

0

Hatfield, MA — On Sunday, the e-mail below was sent to coaches and team contacts.

A few reminders…

Team Rankings: The next rankings will be reviewed on Monday, at 6 PM ET. If your results are not posted to the US Squash Scoring System, they will not be considered for ranking purposes. Without results in the US Squash Scoring System, your team will not be credited appropriately. At most, you have 48 hours after a match is played to submit results.

Awards: It is time to begin thinking about nominating players/teams for the CSA’s awards.
  • Scholar Athlete/Academic Recognition Nominations: Nominations and forms for Scholar Athlete/Academic Recognition must be submitted to Dent Wilkens ([email protected]) by February 10th. Late submissions will not be accepted. Info about the award and the forms will be published on the website this week. If a school has a January term, do not wait for January grades prior to submitting the forms.
  • MCSA Award Nominations: Nominations for the Skillman Award are due by February 1st, while nominations for the Barnaby and Sloane Awards are due by February 10th.
  • WCSA Award Nominations: Nominations for the Richey and Wetzel Awards are due by February 1st, while nominations for the Most Improved Team and Chaffee Awards are due by February 10th.

Club Teams and Team Championships: Thank you to the club teams that responded by the January 15th deadline to declare for Team Championships.

As a reminder, club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9-player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

Below are the declared teams and their status on meeting the qualification standard for Team Championships:

Men’s Teams:

  • Boston College – 3 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 7 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Boston University – 7 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 5 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Brandeis University – 7 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Bucknell University – 5 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 3 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Cal Berkeley – 1 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 1 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Chicago, Univ. of – 2 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Colgate University – 5 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 2 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • College of Charleston – 0 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Denison – 6 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Duke University – 3 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Georgetown University – 6 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 3 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Johns Hopkins University – 6 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 3 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Lehigh University – 2 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 3 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Miami, Univ. of – 0 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Minnesota, Univ. of – 7 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 4 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Northeastern University – 4 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 6 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Northwestern University – 5 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 3 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Notre Dame, University of – 4 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Oregon, University of – 1 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 4 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Penn State University – 7 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Richmond, University of – 7 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Siena College – 7 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 1 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Southern California, University of – 4 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 1 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Stanford University – 6 Matches played in 1st semester; 5 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 2 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Aleady qualfied for Championships
  • Swarthmore College – 14 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 1 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Virginia, University of – 10 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 4 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Washington University in St. Louis – 3 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Washington, University of – 5 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 2 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships

Women’s Teams:

  • Boston College – 4 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 6 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Boston University – 7 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 1 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Bucknell University – 1 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 4 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • California Berkeley, Univ. of – 0 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Colgate University – 6 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 4 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Denison – 4 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Fordham – 1 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 1 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Georgetown University – 3 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 4 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Johns Hopkins University – 5 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 5 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Minnesota, University of – 5 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Northeastern University – 5 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 3 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Rochester, Univ. of – 4 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 7 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Smith College – 5 Matches played in 1st semester; 4 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 5 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Aleady qualfied for Championships
  • Virginia, Univ. of – 10 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 4 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships
  • Washington University in St. Louis – 2 Matches played in 1st semester; 0 matches played to date in 2nd semester; 0 matches scheduled in US Squash Scoring System; Has not yet qualfied for Championships

Training Trips: If any teams have done (or are doing) training trips this season, the CSA would like to publish an article from your captains or players on the experience. Please submit articles to me upon your return. These may be rough and I will clean the articles up.

Match Results with Default Players: As we prepare for computerized team and individual rankings towards the end of the month, please remember to enter only matches that were actually played in your results. For example, entering “Player A” defeated “Default” 11-0, 11-0, 11-0″ does nothing but cause extra work and could potentially inflate or deflate Player A’s and Default’s individual ranking. (“Default” does better than you would think in the simulated individual rankings!) If a match is not played — even if your player would have played the match — do not enter your player’s name; mark the match as a double default.

Harrow Sports Player of the Week: Please nominate deserving players for Player of the Week honors by 6 PM ET on Monday.

  • Criteria: A Player of the Week should have a significant impact on his or her team’s performance during the prior week and demonstrate sportsmanship.
  • Nominations: Coaches, Sports Information Directors, and Team Contacts may nominate players
Match Results with “Not on Roster” players: As a reminder, make sure your results include all players who participated in the match. Like last season, we are prepared to remove teams from the rankings if “Not on Roster” players are not entered. Please contact Dent Wilkens ([email protected]) if you need assistance fixing match results with “Not on Roster” players.
Men’s Matches with “Not on Roster” players (as of 1/17/16):
  • Ohio St University: Denison University match (7th warning)
ReBound Initiative: As announced, the CSA will support the ReBound initiative. The ReBound initiative aims to collect usable squash gear, such as racquets, goggles, shoes, and grips, and donate it to the emerging international affiliates of NUSEA. Teams will be individually contacted about this initiative in the coming weeks.
Team Roster and Schedule Updates: The 2015-2016 CSA league is posted online and available for CSA coaches to update their rosters for the season.
To update your team roster, logon to your account and click on the “manage roster” tab. Then add any new players and remove any that are no longer playing for your team.
Note: If you are not listed as a coach on your team’s page, please contact dent.wilkens@ussquash.com to have your team’s page updated.
Here are links to the instructions on how to add/remove players from your rosters and enter match results.
Minimum # of Players: For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Except for Emerging Teams, matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.
Qualifications for Team Nationals:
  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9 player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.
Rule Updates: During the offseason, the Executive Committees discussed possible rule changes. Many of these proposals were also discussed by coaches during the two-day CSA Strategic Review session, which was held in early June at Yale University. In preparation for the 2015 – 2016 season, the College Squash Association has updated six of its rules:
Coaches and Team Contacts need to be familiar with these rule updates. To see exact changes, please refer to the “Update on″ link at the bottom of the page for each modified rule.

Around the Courts: College Squash Highlights (1/17/2016)

0

College Squash AssociationHatfield, MA — It as an eventful week of squash, with the majority of college matches occurring at the Pioneer Valley Invitational.

On Monday, Trinity hosted Cornell. Both Bantam squads earned 8-1 victories against Cornell. The victory was especially meaningful to Paul Assaiante, the men’s coach for Trinity, as it marked his 500th collegiate squash coaching victory. In addition to coaching at Trinity, Assaiante previously coached at Army and Williams.

On Tuesday, Middlebury had its home opener when it hosted Amherst. The Panthers men and women each earned 8-1 victories.

Mount Holyoke travelled to Maine for two days’ worth of matches with Bates, Bowdoin, and Colby. The Lyons went 0-3 on the trip.

Columbia welcomed Trinity on Wednesday. The Bantams’ men and women were imposing guests and left the Big Apple with 9-0 victories.

Middlebury hosted St. Lawrence. In the women’s match, Middlebury prevailed, 8-1, but fell 1-8 to the St. Lawrence men.

In a matchup of Mid-Atlantic rivals, George Washington visited the Naval Academy. Tied at 4-4, George Washington battled back from an 0-2 deficit in the final match for a 5-4 team victory.

Navy headed north for a Friday match with Williams. After 8 matches, the Midshipmen had enough wins to claim victory. In the end, Navy defeated Williams, 5-4.

Cornell hosted Columbia in an Ivy League match. For the second year in a row, the Columbia men defeated the Big Red, 7-2. The 8th-ranked Columbia women were also victorious, 5-4, which marked the Lions’ first victory over the 7th-ranked Big Red.

At the Pioneer Valley Invitational, tri-hosts Amherst, Mount Holyoke, and Smith College had fifteen other schools participate in a 50-match round robin event. Play started on Friday with Amherst hosting and losing to the Yale women, 0-9. Yale also defeated the Hamilton women, 9-0. The Amherst men and women each defeated Hamilton, 7-2. MIT went 2-0 on Friday with victories over Conn College, 8-1, and Stanford, 5-4. In their opening matches, the Wesleyan Cardinals defeated the Stanford Cardinal men, 9-0, and the Mount Holyoke Lyons, 7-2. Later in the day, the Wesleyan men defeated Colby, 5-4, and the Cardinals women lost to the Mules, 2-7. Conn College earned victories over the Haverford men, 5-4, and the Haverford women, 8-1. The Conn College women also defeated Smith. The Colby men defeated Western Ontario, 6-3, while the Mules’ women shutout Smith College.

In the evening match at Amherst, Dickinson played Hobart and William Smith. The 24th-ranked Hobart men earned an 8-1 victory over the 25th-ranked Red Devils. In the women’s match, William Smith prevailed, 6-3.

On Saturday, Drexel visited Dartmouth. In the men’s match, the Big Green defeated Drexel, 6-3. In the women’s match, 12th-ranked Drexel edged 9th-ranked Dartmouth, 5-4. Although this is only their second meeting, this was the Drexel women’s first-ever victory over the Big Green.

To close out their short home schedule, Middlebury hosted Brown. The Brown women defeated the Panthers, 6-3. The 16th-ranked Middlebury men edged 15th-ranked Brown, 5-4.

In Philadelphia, the 2nd-ranked Penn Quakers shutout the Stanford women.

The Yale men began a road trip in upstate New York on Saturday. The Bulldogs defeated St. Lawrence, 6-3. Also in upstate New York, the Rochester men topped Columbia, 9-0.

In Hartford, both Trinity squads shutout Franklin & Marshall.

George Washington began their day at Williams. The Colonial men defeated Williams, 6-3. The 13th-ranked Williams women surprised 10th-ranked George Washington, 6-3.

The Pioneer Valley Invitational continued on Saturday. In an early matchup, 8 AM, MIT and Mount Holyoke faced Dickinson. MIT was a 7-2 victor over Dickinson, while Mount Holyoke fell, 3-6, to the Red Devils. MIT added a victory over Haverford to conclude their PVI trip with a 4-0 record. Hamilton and Colby traded matches. The Hamilton women won, 6-3, while the Colby men won, 7-2. The Hamilton men also lost to Western Ontario, 7-2, but the Continental women defeated Mount Holyoke, 9-0. Western Ontario lost to Bates, 1-8. Hobart earned a pair of victories in back-to-back matches with Stanford and Haverford. William Smith defeated Haverford and Conn College. The Haverford women picked up a victory over Smith. Conn College fell to the Amherst women, 9-0, while the Camel men lost to Stanford, 0-9. Dickinson earned victories over both Conn College squads, including a 5-4 win in the women’s match.

Navy join the Pioneer Valley Invitational on Saturday. The Midshipmen sunk Amherst, 8-1. Amherst and Colby traded matches. The Colby men defeated Amherst, 6-3, while the Amherst women were 9-0 winners over the Mules. In the evening match, George Washington faced Bates. The George Washington women won 7-2. The men’s match was tight, and ultimately George Washington emerged with a 5-4 victory over the Bobcats.

On Sunday, the Columbia women hosted and lost to Stanford, 2-7.

Williams hosted Franklin & Marshall and Middlebury. The 15th-ranked Diplomat women defeated 14th-ranked MIddlebury, 7-2. The F&M men defeated the Panthers, 7-2.  Williams edged the F&M women, 5-4, but fell to the Diplomat men, 6-3.

The Yale men concluded their northern New York trip with a stop at Rochester. With the 2nd-ranked Bulldogs on the brink, 4-3, the host and 7th-ranked Yellowjackets won the final two matches to earn a 5-4 victory.

On the final day of the Pioneer Valley Invitational, George Washington faced the Wesleyan women and the Western Ontario men. The Colonials were victorious in both matches. Mount Holyoke earned a 9-0 victory over Haverford to conclude their weekend. Hobart and William Smith faced Colby. Colby coach Sakhi Khan led the Mules to a 6-3 victory over Hobart, a team that his son plays for. The Mules also defeated William Smith, 9-0. William Smith shutout Smith in their final match of the tournament.

Navy concluded their weekend with a match with Bates. The Midshipmen’s depth helped them capture positions 5 through 9 and a 5-4 victory. In 5-4 matches, Navy went 2-1 on the week. Amherst defeated both Dickinson squads. In addition, the Amherst women defeated Bates, 7-2, while the Bobcat men earned an 8-1 victory over Amherst.

Coaches and Team Contacts, please remember to enter your team’s results in the US Squash Scoring System on the day of each match. Each player must be named in the results (“Not on Roster” entries will not be tolerated) or penalties may be applied.

Schools are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, a minimum number of matches must be played at specific periods of the season:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

For a regular season match to officially count for ranking purposes, each team must have at least seven players. Except for Emerging Teams, matches with less than seven players per team will not count towards the required number of matches for entry into the National Team Championships.

For complete results from all of this weekend’s action, see Women’s Results and Men’s Results.

2015-2016 Dunlop Men’s College Squash Team Rankings (1/10/2016)

0
[rankingimage] Hatfield, MA — Today, the fifth [mtr] of the season were released.

The top 8 positions saw another round of changes as the second semester commenced. Harvard’s victory over Penn, Yale’s victory over Columbia, and Penn’s win against Dartmouth shuffled the order. Yale moves into the 2nd position, followed by Penn, Harvard, and Dartmouth. Don’t be surprised if teams keep switching positions in the Potter Cup (A Division) right up until Team Championships.

Middlebury’s victory over Bates and Bates’ victory over Williams changed ranking positions 14 – 18. Navy and Brown slide up a position to 14th and 15th, while Middlebury rose two positions to 16th, followed by Bates and Williams.

As a reminder, the College Squash Association updated its ranking rules for the 2015 – 2016 season. Varsity teams are ranked throughout the season (manually until January 25th when a computer algorithm has enough data to rank teams), while club and emerging club programs will only be ranked the week before Team Championships.

Teams are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, they must meet minimum match requirements:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9 player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

Below are the [mtr] as of January 10, 2016. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking.

  1. Trinity College (1)
  2. Yale University (6)
  3. Pennsylvania, University of (2)
  4. Harvard University (8)
  5. Dartmouth College (7)
  6. St. Lawrence University (3)
  7. Rochester, University of (4)
  8. Columbia University (5)
  9. Drexel University (9)
  10. Franklin & Marshall College (10)
  11. Princeton University (11)
  12. Cornell University (12)
  13. George Washington University (13)
  14. Naval Academy (15)
  15. Brown University (16)
  16. Middlebury College (18)
  17. Bates College (17)
  18. Williams College (14)
  19. Wesleyan University (19)
  20. Colby College (20)
  21. Bowdoin College (21)
  22. Amherst College (22)
  23. Western Ontario, University of (23)
  24. Hobart College (24)
  25. Dickinson College (25)
  26. Tufts University (26)
  27. MIT (27)
  28. Hamilton College (28)
  29. Connecticut College (29)
  30. Haverford College (30)
  31. Fordham University (31)
  32. Bard College (32)
  33. Vassar College (33)

2015-2016 Dunlop Women’s College Squash Team Rankings (1/10/2016)

0
[rankingimage] Hatfield, MA — Today, the fifth [wtr] of the season were released.

With Colby’s victory over St. Lawrence, the Mules moved up a position to 22nd in this week’s rankings. St. Lawrence dropped to 23rd. There appears to be parity for many teams this season, which should make for exciting Team Championship weekends.

As a reminder, the College Squash Association updated its ranking rules for the 2015 – 2016 season. Varsity teams are ranked throughout the season (manually until January 25th when a computer algorithm has enough data to rank teams), while club and emerging club programs will only be ranked the week before Team Championships.

Teams are reminded that to qualify for the National Team Championships, they must meet minimum match requirements:

  • Varsity teams are required to play ten (10) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships. At minimum, each team should have at least 6 different opponents. Varsity teams should play the majority of their matches against other varsity schools.
  • Club teams are required to play eight (8) matches against other CSA teams to enter team championships in a 9 player division. In addition, club teams must play at least four (4) matches between January 1st and February 10th. At minimum, each team should have at least five (5) different opponents.

Below are the [wtr] as of January 10, 2016. Listed after each school’s name is their previous ranking.

  1. Harvard University (1)
  2. Pennsylvania, University of (2)
  3. Princeton University (3)
  4. Yale University (4)
  5. Stanford University (5)
  6. Trinity College (6)
  7. Cornell University (7)
  8. Columbia University (8)
  9. Dartmouth College (9)
  10. George Washington University (10)
  11. Brown University (11)
  12. Drexel University (13)
  13. Williams College (12)
  14. Middlebury College (14)
  15. Franklin and Marshall College (15)
  16. Amherst College (16)
  17. Bowdoin College (17)
  18. Bates College (18)
  19. Hamilton College (19)
  20. Wesleyan University (21)
  21. Wellesley College (22)
  22. Colby College (23)
  23. St. Lawrence University (20)
  24. William Smith College (24)
  25. Dickinson College (25)
  26. Tufts University (26)
  27. Mount Holyoke College (27)
  28. Connecticut College (28)
  29. Vassar College (29)
  30. Haverford College (30)